Techfullnews

WHO OWNS FERRARI AND WHERE ARE THE CARS BUILT?

ferrari/techfullnews

When it comes to the world of high-performance automobiles, few names evoke as much passion, prestige, and power as Ferrari. Since its inception in 1947, Ferrari has been synonymous with speed, luxury, and racing dominance. From its iconic Prancing Horse logo to its handcrafted, high-performance vehicles, Ferrari has cemented its place as one of the most revered automotive brands in history.

In this article, we’ll explore Ferrari’s origins, its evolution from a racing powerhouse to a global luxury brand, and what makes its cars so extraordinary. Whether you’re a die-hard Ferrari enthusiast or simply curious about the brand’s legacy, this deep dive will provide a comprehensive look at the Italian marque that continues to captivate the world.


The Birth of Ferrari: A Racing Legacy

Ferrari’s story begins with its founder, Enzo Ferrari, a man whose name is forever intertwined with the world of motorsport. Enzo’s passion for racing was evident long before he founded his own company. In the 1920s and 1930s, he worked closely with Alfa Romeo’s racing division, where he honed his skills as a driver, team manager, and strategist.

In 1947, Enzo Ferrari took a bold step and founded Auto Avio Costruzioni, which would later become Ferrari S.p.A. That same year, the company unveiled its first street-legal car, the 125 S, powered by a 1.5-liter V12 engine. While the 125 S was a road car, Enzo’s true passion lay in racing. Ferrari quickly established itself as a dominant force on the track, winning its first Grand Prix in 1948 and securing its first 24 Hours of Le Mans victory in 1949.


Ferrari’s Ownership Journey: From Enzo to Public Trading

Enzo Ferrari was the driving force behind the company in its early years, but as Ferrari grew, so did its ownership complexities. Here’s a brief overview of Ferrari’s ownership history:

  • 1969: Enzo Ferrari sold a 50% stake in the company to Fiat, the Italian automotive giant, to secure financial stability and fund further growth.
  • 1988: Following Enzo’s death, Fiat increased its ownership stake to 90%, leaving the remaining 10% to Enzo’s son, Piero Ferrari.
  • 2016: Fiat (now part of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) spun off Ferrari as an independent entity, listing it on the New York Stock Exchange.

Today, Ferrari’s ownership is divided as follows:

  • Public Shareholders: 58.8%
  • Piero Ferrari: 10.48%
  • Exor N.V.: 24.65% (the holding company of the Agnelli family, founders of Fiat)
  • BlackRock Inc.: 6.07%

Despite these changes, Ferrari has remained true to its Italian roots and racing heritage.


Ferrari’s Manufacturing: A Testament to Craftsmanship

One of the most remarkable aspects of Ferrari is its commitment to craftsmanship and exclusivity. Every Ferrari is manufactured in Maranello, Italy, at a sprawling 1.78-million-square-foot facility. Unlike mass-produced vehicles, Ferraris are built with meticulous attention to detail, blending cutting-edge technology with traditional handcrafting techniques.

Why Are Ferrari Production Numbers So Low?

In 2023, Ferrari produced just 13,752 vehicles. This limited production is intentional and reflects the brand’s focus on exclusivity and quality. Here’s why Ferrari makes so few cars:

  1. Handcrafted Excellence: Ferrari engines are cast in-house, and each powerplant is assembled by hand. This level of care ensures unparalleled performance and reliability.
  2. Customization: Ferrari offers extensive customization options, allowing buyers to personalize everything from the paint color to the stitching on the seats.
  3. Exclusivity: By limiting production, Ferrari maintains its status as a luxury brand, ensuring that owning a Ferrari remains a rare and prestigious experience.

Ferrari’s Iconic Cars: From the Track to the Silver Screen

Ferrari’s vehicles are not just cars—they’re works of art. Over the decades, the brand has produced some of the most iconic and sought-after cars in history. Here are a few highlights:

1. Ferrari 250 GTO (1962)

Widely regarded as one of the most beautiful cars ever made, the 250 GTO is also a racing legend. With only 36 units produced, it’s one of the rarest and most valuable Ferraris, often fetching over $50 million at auction.

2. Ferrari F40 (1987)

Built to celebrate Ferrari’s 40th anniversary, the F40 was the last car personally approved by Enzo Ferrari. Its turbocharged V8 engine and lightweight design made it a performance icon.

3. Ferrari LaFerrari (2013)

As Ferrari’s first hybrid hypercar, the LaFerrari combined a 6.3-liter V12 engine with an electric motor to produce 950 horsepower. It represents the pinnacle of Ferrari’s engineering prowess.

4. Ferrari in Pop Culture

Ferrari’s allure extends beyond the automotive world. The brand’s cars have starred in countless films, from “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” (1986) to the “Fast & Furious” franchise. Even a destroyed Ferrari—like the one that sold for $1.8 million—commands astronomical prices, a testament to the brand’s enduring appeal.


The Prancing Horse: A Symbol of Excellence

Ferrari’s iconic logo, the Prancing Horse, was inspired by a World War I fighter pilot, Francesco Baracca, who painted the emblem on his plane. Enzo Ferrari adopted the logo at the suggestion of an Italian countess, adding a yellow background to represent the color of Modena, his hometown.

Today, the Prancing Horse is a global symbol of speed, power, and luxury. It’s a badge that represents not just a car, but a legacy of excellence.


Ferrari’s Future: Innovation Meets Tradition

As Ferrari looks to the future, it continues to push the boundaries of automotive innovation while staying true to its heritage. Recent developments include:

  • Electric and Hybrid Models: Ferrari has embraced electrification, with models like the SF90 Stradale and plans for a fully electric Ferrari by 2025.
  • Sustainability: The Maranello factory is powered by renewable energy, and Ferrari is committed to reducing its environmental impact.
  • Racing Dominance: Ferrari remains a force in motorsport, competing in Formula 1 and other racing series with unwavering passion.

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of Ferrari

Ferrari is more than just a car manufacturer—it’s a symbol of ambition, innovation, and Italian craftsmanship. From its humble beginnings in 1947 to its status as a global luxury icon, Ferrari has consistently redefined what’s possible in the automotive world.

Whether you’re drawn to the roar of a Ferrari engine, the elegance of its design, or the thrill of its racing heritage, there’s no denying the magic of the Prancing Horse. As Ferrari continues to evolve, one thing is certain: its legacy will endure for generations to come.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In late 2023, The Wall Street Journal dropped a bombshell report claiming Tesla’s board had quietly initiated a search for Elon Musk’s successor as CEO. According to anonymous sources familiar with the matter:

  • The board allegedly began the process approximately one month before the report
  • Multiple executive search firms were contacted, with one firm reportedly selected to lead the process
  • Directors supposedly urged Musk to publicly commit more time to Tesla

The timing is critical. This alleged search coincided with:

  • Tesla’s first year-over-year delivery decline since 2020 (8.5% drop in Q1 2024)
  • A 13% decline in annual revenue – the first since 2017
  • Musk’s increasingly polarizing political engagements

Tesla’s Furious Rebuttal and the Credibility Battle

Within hours of publication, Tesla launched an aggressive counterattack:

1. Official Statement from Chair Robyn Denholm:

  • Called the report “absolutely false”
  • Claimed the board remains “highly confident” in Musk’s leadership
  • Alleged the WSJ was informed of this before publication

2. Musk’s Personal Response:

  • Accused WSJ of “EXTREMELY BAD BREACH OF ETHICS”
  • Claimed the paper ignored Tesla’s “unequivocal denial”

Journalistic Standoff:
The WSJ maintains it:

  • Reached out to Musk for comment (received no response)
  • Never received any pre-publication statement from Tesla

This credibility battle raises serious questions about:

  • The independence of Tesla’s board
  • The reliability of anonymous sourcing
  • Musk’s increasingly adversarial relationship with mainstream media

Deep Dive: Tesla’s Board Composition and Governance Concerns

Tesla’s eight-member board has long faced criticism for its close ties to Musk:

Notable Members:

  1. Kimbal Musk (Elon’s brother)
  2. James Murdoch (son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch)
  3. Ira Ehrenpreis (venture capitalist, Tesla director since 2007)
  4. Robyn Denholm (Chair since 2018)

Governance Red Flags:

  • Lack of Independence: 5 of 8 directors have served over 10 years
  • Compensation Controversy: Approved Musk’s $56B pay package (later voided by court)
  • Recent Insider Selling: Denholm sold $50M+ in shares over 90 days

Expert Perspective:
“Tesla’s board fails nearly every test of good corporate governance,” says Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. “The level of entrenchment and lack of independent oversight is unprecedented for a company of this size.”

The Five Critical Challenges Facing Tesla’s Leadership

1. The “Key Person” Risk

Musk isn’t just CEO – he’s Tesla’s:

  • Chief product architect
  • Primary technology visionary
  • Main public spokesperson

Succession Planning Reality:

  • Apple began grooming Tim Cook years before Steve Jobs’ passing
  • Microsoft had Satya Nadella in leadership pipeline before Ballmer’s exit
  • Tesla has no publicly identified successor

2. Musk’s Divided Attention

The billionaire currently oversees:

  • SpaceX (CEO)
  • Neuralink (Founder)
  • The Boring Company (Founder)
  • xAI (Founder)
  • X/Twitter (Owner)

Time Allocation Impact:

  • 2023 analysis shows Musk spent <40% time at Tesla
  • Critical product launches (Cybertruck, Roadster) repeatedly delayed

3. Brand Erosion and Political Polarization

Musk’s recent activities:

  • Endorsed conservative political candidates
  • Acquired Twitter and reinstated banned accounts
  • Made controversial statements on gender, COVID, and other hot-button issues

Consumer Impact:

  • 2023 survey showed 18% drop in brand favorability among Democrats
  • 7% increase among Republicans (showing increasing politicization)

4. Operational Challenges

Production Issues:

  • Cybertruck production at 25% of targets
  • Model 3 Highland refresh delayed in North America

Financial Pressures:

  • Operating margins fell from 19% (2021) to 8% (2023)
  • $18B debt load with rising interest expenses

5. Technological Crossroads

Autonomy Delays:

  • Full Self-Driving (FSD) still at Level 2 after 10+ years
  • Major competitors (Waymo, Cruise) deploying robotaxis

Battery Innovation:

  • 4680 cells not meeting energy density targets
  • Chinese competitors achieving faster charging speeds

Potential Succession Scenarios and Implications

Internal Candidates Analysis

1. Drew Baglino (Former SVP Powertrain & Energy)

  • Strengths: Deep technical expertise, 18-year Tesla veteran
  • Weaknesses: Limited public-facing experience, resigned April 2024

2. Tom Zhu (SVP Automotive)

  • Strengths: Turned around China operations, production expert
  • Weaknesses: Limited autonomy/AI experience

3. Lars Moravy (VP Vehicle Engineering)

  • Strengths: Product development leader, respected internally
  • Weaknesses: Unknown strategic vision

External Possibilities

Wildcard Option:
Could Tesla recruit an auto industry veteran like:

  • Jim Farley (Ford CEO)
  • Herbert Diess (Former VW CEO)

Tech Industry Options:

  • Jennifer Tejada (Former PagerDuty CEO)
  • Gwynne Shotwell (SpaceX COO)

Investor Perspectives: What the Street Is Saying

Bull Case:

  • “Musk is irreplaceable as a tech visionary” – Dan Ives, Wedbush
  • “Succession planning doesn’t equal imminent change” – Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley

Bear Case:

  • “The board has failed shareholders by not planning sooner” – GLJ Research
  • “Tesla needs an operational CEO to complement Musk’s vision” – Bernstein

Institutional Investor Sentiment:

  • Vanguard and BlackRock both supported shareholder proposals for better succession planning
  • 32% of votes favored independent chair proposal in 2023 (up from 26% in 2022)

Historical Precedents: Lessons From Tech Leadership Transitions

Successful Transitions:

  1. Microsoft (Ballmer → Nadella)
    • Key: Clear succession pipeline
    • Result: $500B+ value creation
  2. Apple (Jobs → Cook)
    • Key: Multi-year transition period
    • Result: Maintained innovation while scaling

Failed Transitions:

  1. Uber (Kalanick → Khosrowshahi)
    • Issue: Crisis-driven change
    • Result: Years of instability
  2. WeWork (Neumann → SoftBank takeover)
    • Issue: No planning
    • Result: Near-collapse

The Path Forward: Strategic Recommendations

For Tesla’s Board

  1. Formalize Succession Plan
    • Identify 2-3 internal candidates
    • Establish mentorship program
  2. Enhance Governance
    • Add independent directors
    • Separate Chair/CEO roles
  3. Manage Transparent Communication
    • Public roadmap for leadership development
    • Clear timelines for any transitions

For Investors

  1. Monitor These Key Metrics:
    • Musk’s time allocation (via jet tracking, public appearances)
    • Board refreshment (any new independent appointments)
    • Succession-related disclosures in next proxy statement
  2. Engagement Priorities:
    • Push for formal succession committee
    • Advocate for board independence

Conclusion: Why This Matters Beyond Tesla

The Tesla leadership saga represents a case study in:

  • Founder-led company challenges
  • Board governance in disruptive tech
  • Investor rights in high-growth firms

As Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood recently noted: “The market isn’t pricing in the key person risk at Tesla. When that changes, it could be dramatic.”

The coming months will prove crucial. Will Tesla:

  • Double down on Musk’s leadership?
  • Begin a gradual transition?
  • Face a crisis-driven change?

One thing is certain: How Tesla navigates this challenge will shape not just its future, but the broader conversation about leadership in transformative companies.

Last night, an audacious new automaker named Slate Auto unveiled its first vehicle—a minimalist, no-frills electric truck designed to combat America’s obsession with oversized, overpowered vehicles. With a target price under $20,000 (after incentives), 150 miles of range, and stripped-back design, the Slate Truck is a bold experiment in right-sizing personal transportation.

But will it succeed in a market dominated by monster trucks and SUVs?


Why America’s Obsession With Bigger Trucks Is a Problem

1. The Rise of the “Land Yacht”

  • In 2024, trucks and SUVs made up 75% of new vehicle sales—up from just 50% a decade ago.
  • The average new car now weighs over 5,000 lbs (2.27 tons), with EVs like the Ford F-150 Lightning pushing 6,500 lbs.
  • Bigger vehicles = deadlier roads:
    • Pedestrian deaths surged 57% from 2013–2022 (NHTSA).
    • Trucks with tall hoods (40+ inches) are 44% more lethal (IIHS).

2. The “Compact Truck” Is Nearly Extinct

  • Ford Maverick (2024):
    • 199.7 inches long, 83.5 inches wide
    • Considered “small” by today’s standards
  • Slate Truck:
    • 174.6 inches long, 70.6 inches wide
    • Closer in size to a classic 1985 Toyota pickup

“Our roads are packed with roving land yachts. The Slate Truck is a throwback to when vehicles were sized for humans, not egos.”


Slate Truck: What You Get (And What You Don’t)

✅ The Good: Simple, Affordable, Functional

✔ **20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(49,740).
✔ No Bloatware – No touchscreen, no stereo, no paint (keeps costs down).
✔ Smartphone-Centric – Uses a phone/tablet mount + basic gauge cluster.
✔ Practical Hauling – 1,433 lbs payload, 1,000 lbs towing (enough for most users).

❌ The Trade-Offs

  • 150-Mile Range – Fine for city use, but not for road trips.
  • No Luxury Features – If you want Apple CarPlay or a premium sound system, look elsewhere.
  • Aftermarket Customization Required – Want paint? A stereo? You’ll have to DIY.

Could This Be the Start of a “Small Truck” Revival?

Why the Timing Might Be Right

  • EV Incentives – Federal tax credits could keep prices under $20K.
  • Younger Buyers – Gen Z and Millennials prefer affordability over status symbols.
  • Urban Living – Smaller trucks are easier to park in cities.

The Biggest Challenges

⚠ Consumer Psychology – Will buyers reject a “cheap” truck in a premium-obsessed market?
⚠ Political Risk – A Trump win could kill EV tax credits, raising the price.
⚠ Production Realities – Most EV startups fail. Can Slate deliver by 2026?


Verdict: A Long Shot, But a Necessary One

The Slate Truck isn’t for everyone—but it doesn’t need to be. If even 5% of truck buyers opt for a smaller, cheaper, more efficient alternative, it could shift the auto industry’s trajectory.

Final Question:

Would you drive a $20K electric truck with no frills?

  • Yes, if it saves money!
  • No, I need more power/luxury.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles