The Apple Car: A $10 Billion Failure

Imagine a sleek, futuristic car with the iconic Apple logo on its hood. A vehicle that combines cutting-edge technology, minimalist design, and the seamless integration of Apple’s ecosystem. For years, this was the dream of the Apple Car, a project that promised to revolutionize the automotive industry. But in 2024, after a decade of development and an estimated $10 billion spent, Apple officially pulled the plug on its ambitious car project, codenamed Project Titan.

What went wrong? How did one of the most valuable companies in the world, known for its innovation and execution, fail to deliver on such a high-profile project? This is the story of the Apple Car—a tale of ambition, missteps, and ultimately, a $10 billion failure.

The Dream: Why Apple Wanted to Build a Car

Apple’s interest in the automotive industry wasn’t just about building a car. It was about redefining transportation.

The Vision

Apple saw the car as the next frontier for its ecosystem. Imagine an iPhone on wheels—a vehicle that could sync with your Apple devices, offer autonomous driving, and provide a seamless user experience. This vision aligned with Apple’s core philosophy of creating products that are both functional and beautiful.

The Timing

The early 2010s were a pivotal moment for the automotive industry. Electric vehicles (EVs) were gaining traction, thanks to Tesla’s success, and autonomous driving technology was advancing rapidly. Apple, always looking for the next big thing, saw an opportunity to disrupt the market.

The Reality: Challenges from Day One

While the vision was compelling, the execution was anything but smooth. Project Titan faced numerous challenges, both internal and external.

Leadership Turmoil

One of the biggest hurdles was leadership instability. Over the years, the project saw multiple changes in leadership, each with a different vision for the car. Some leaders pushed for a fully autonomous vehicle, while others favored a more traditional EV with advanced features. This lack of direction created confusion and delays.

Technical Difficulties

Building a car is vastly different from building a smartphone or a laptop. Apple underestimated the complexity of automotive engineering, from battery technology to safety regulations. For example, developing a reliable autonomous driving system proved to be far more challenging than anticipated.

Cultural Clash

Apple’s secretive, design-driven culture clashed with the collaborative, engineering-heavy nature of the automotive industry. Partnerships with established car manufacturers, such as BMW and Hyundai, fell apart due to disagreements over data sharing and control.

The Cost: A $10 Billion Experiment

By the time Apple decided to cancel Project Titan, the company had reportedly spent around $10 billion on the project. Where did all that money go?

Research and Development

A significant portion of the budget was allocated to R&D. Apple invested heavily in autonomous driving technology, hiring top talent from companies like Tesla, Google, and Ford. The company also acquired several startups specializing in AI, mapping, and sensor technology.

Testing and Prototyping

Apple built numerous prototypes, ranging from modified Lexus SUVs to custom-designed vehicles. These prototypes were tested extensively, but none met Apple’s high standards for performance and design.

Infrastructure and Partnerships

Apple also spent money on building infrastructure, such as test tracks and data centers, and exploring partnerships with suppliers and manufacturers. However, these efforts often led to dead ends.

The Competition: Why Apple Couldn’t Keep Up

While Apple was struggling to get its car off the ground, competitors were racing ahead.

Tesla’s Dominance

Tesla had a head start in the EV market and was already producing vehicles at scale. By the time Apple entered the scene, Tesla had established itself as the leader in both EVs and autonomous driving technology.

Traditional Automakers

Companies like Ford, General Motors, and Volkswagen were also investing heavily in EVs and autonomous driving. Unlike Apple, these companies had decades of experience in automotive manufacturing and supply chain management.

Tech Giants

Google’s Waymo and Amazon’s Zoox were making significant strides in autonomous driving, further intensifying the competition.

The Fallout: What Went Wrong?

So, why did Apple ultimately decide to cancel Project Titan?

Shifting Priorities

Under CEO Tim Cook, Apple has always been cautious about entering new markets. With the car project facing endless delays and mounting costs, the company decided to focus on its core products, such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, as well as emerging technologies like augmented reality (AR).

Market Realities

The EV market is becoming increasingly crowded, with slim profit margins and intense competition. Apple likely realized that it would be difficult to achieve the same level of success in the automotive industry as it has in consumer electronics.

Lessons Learned

While the Apple Car may have failed, the project wasn’t a total loss. Apple gained valuable expertise in AI, machine learning, and sensor technology, which could be applied to other products, such as AR glasses or home robotics.

The Legacy: What’s Next for Apple?

Although the Apple Car is no more, its legacy lives on.

Focus on Software

Apple is reportedly shifting its focus to developing software for autonomous vehicles, rather than building its own car. This could include infotainment systems, mapping technology, or even a full-fledged autonomous driving platform.

Augmented Reality

Apple’s work on AR could lead to new products that integrate with vehicles, such as AR headsets for navigation or entertainment.

Sustainability

Apple’s commitment to sustainability could also influence the automotive industry. The company’s expertise in battery technology and renewable energy could be applied to EVs or other green technologies.

A Bold Dream, a Costly Failure

The Apple Car was a bold dream that captured the imagination of millions. But in the end, it was a dream that proved too difficult to realize. Despite its $10 billion investment, Apple couldn’t overcome the challenges of entering a complex and competitive industry.

Yet, failure is often a stepping stone to success. The lessons learned from Project Titan could pave the way for future innovations, ensuring that Apple remains at the forefront of technology.

As for the Apple Car, it will go down in history as a $10 billion experiment—a reminder that even the most ambitious dreams can sometimes fall short.

Tesla gives up on selling cars

Google’s AI enabled me to create subpar Nintendo knockoffs

Chevrolet’s Silverado ZR2 looks great, but smart money buys a different trim

OpenAI disputes culpability in the teen suicide action, citing’misuse’ of ChatGPT

Cars

RESALE VALUE OF THE MAZDA CX-5: HOW QUICK HAS THE SUV DEPRECIATED?

by George Mensah 2025-11-15

The Mazda CX-5 has been one of Mazda’s most influential models since its debut in 2012. Now entering its third generation with the 2026 model year, this compact SUV remains at the heart of the brand’s global success. Over 4.5 million units have been sold worldwide, of which 1.6 million were purchased in the United States, thus easily making it one of Mazda’s most successful nameplates.

But for many shoppers, especially in the used market, one major question remains: How well does the Mazda CX-5 hold its value over time?

Depreciation Breakdown: How Much Value Does a Mazda CX-5 Lose?

The resale value largely depends on the level of depreciation-the natural decline in a vehicle’s worth as time and mileage pile up. While CarEdge data indicates that the CX-5 holds its value relatively well for its class, it still depreciates more quickly than many of its top competitors.

Two-Year-Old Mazda CX-5

Average Depreciation: $12,963

Value Retained: 66.57%

Estimated Resale Value: $25,815

Mileage Assumption: 27,000 miles total (13,500 per year)

Five-Year-Old Mazda CX-5

Average Depreciation: $16,217

Value Retained: 58.18%

Estimated Resale Value: $22,561

Mileage Assumption: 67,500 miles total

These numbers suggest that while the CX-5 retains decent value, it nevertheless surrenders a significant portion of its value within the first five-year period, which is typically where most vehicles lose their value the fastest.

What Influences Depreciation Beyond Age and Mileage?

While time and mileage are the primary drivers of depreciation, several other factors play a major role in how much a used CX-5 is worth:

History of maintenance

The better choice will always be a well-maintained CX-5.

Consistent oil changes

Scheduled services according to Mazda’s recommendations

Proper care for brakes, tires, and fluids

Complete service records can help your vehicle sell more quickly and bring a better sale price.

Type of Driving

A car that does a lot of highway driving is often easier on the vehicle than constant stop-and-go city driving. A CX-5 that has spent its entire life doing long road trips might show less wear than one used to commute daily.

History of Accidents

Clean CarFax or AutoCheck reports greatly increase resale value.

Trim Level and Features

Higher trims, such as the Grand Touring or Signature, especially those with premium packages, will generally retain value better than their base-model brethren.

How the CX-5 Stacks Up Against Its Rivals

The compact SUV segment is highly competitive, with vehicles like the Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, and Subaru Forester always ranking near the very top in resale value. Here’s how the CX-5 compares:

After 2 Years

Toyota RAV4: 83.52% retained

Honda CR-V: 78.77%

Subaru Forester: 77.20%

Mazda CX-5: 66.57%

After 5 Years

Toyota RAV4: 69.42% retained

Honda CR-V: 67.01%

Subaru Forester: 65.98%

Mazda CX-5: 58.18%

These figures indicate that the CX-5 depreciates more quickly than its most popular rivals. For buyers, this is actually a good thing – used CX-5 models usually sell for less than similarly-equipped RAV4s or CR-Vs.

For sellers, though, the lower resale value means they may not recover as much of their investment when it’s time to move on.

The Bottom Line: Who Benefits Most?

Buyers: Buyers benefit by paying lower used prices because of higher depreciation.

Sellers: See resale returns lower than that of CR-V and RAV4 owners.

Simply stated, high depreciation works in the buyer’s favor, while strong resale value benefits the seller. Knowing which side you’re on helps you make the smartest financial decision.

Looking Ahead: The 2026 Mazda CX-5

Mazda is getting ready to introduce the highly anticipated third-generation CX-5 for the 2026 model year. Early reports indicate that

Refined design inspired by the CX-60 and CX-70

Updated safety and entertainment technology

More efficient powertrains

Improved handling and comfort These upgrades might be worth considering for shoppers who are torn between buying used or waiting for the latest model.

Cars

Despite not being enjoyable, the 2026 Toyota Corrola Cross hybrid is funny

by George Mensah 2025-10-29

Generative AI has moved from specialist interest to part of daily life — transforming all from entertainment to the workplace. From AI-generated art, deepfakes, and intelligent chatbots capable of talking like humans, AI is now part of modern life. Yet with technology racing ahead, so do fears it will spin out of control.

Now, a new generation of scientists, business leaders, and celebrities are calling for a slowdown on the next frontier: AI superintelligence — a form of artificial intelligence that potentially could surpass human intellectual ability in almost every dimension.

The Pushback: A Global Call to Slow Down AI Development

A collection of public personalities — such as Virgin Group creator Richard Branson, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and musician will.i.am — signed a new open letter called the “Statement on Superintelligence.”

The warning asks developers and businesses racing towards state-of-the-art AI systems, including OpenAI and Elon Musk’s xAI, to delay the magnitude of massive AI projects until there is a “broad scientific consensus that it will be done safely and controllably” and a “strong public buy-in” to support it.

Notably among them are two of the leading AI researchers, who are also cofounders of modern machine learning. The movement is thus quite heavily weighted.

“We must ensure that AI is serving humanity, and not vice versa,” the letter demands, threatening dire consequences in the event of runaway progress.

What Is AI Superintelligence — and Why Does It Worry Experts?

In order to understand the alarm, defining what AI superintelligence really is, is essential. Superintelligent AI, according to IBM, is a system which not only matches but far exceeds human intelligence — capable of reasoning, learning, and solving problems for itself in every respect, free of human control.

Contrary to current AI systems such as ChatGPT or Gemini, whose boundaries and data sets are defined, superintelligent AI would be continuously learning and evolving, rewriting its own code to increase efficiency and capability. Such recursive enhancement could make it almost impossible to contain.

“A true superintelligence would no longer need human oversight,” said Stuart Russell, an AI researcher at UC Berkeley. “At that point, its goals might diverge from ours — and we’d have no way to stop it.”

The Risks: From Job Losses to Existential Threats

The possible dangers of AI superintelligence go much beyond job automation or misinformation. The threat is mentioned by experts as the possibility of AI systems executing on their own in pursuit of ends that are in conflict with human values or safety.

Some of the highest threats:

Massive Job Displacement – AI already revolutionizes industries, but an entirely automated self-enhancing system could eliminate entire professions, ranging from programmers to creative professionals.

Loss of Human Control – The moment an AI begins to be smarter than the people who create it, it might be beyond control.

Weaponization and Surveillance – AI might be utilized by governments or corporations for total surveillance or robot war.

Existential Risk – In the worst-case scenario, a rogue AI with goals of its own would view humankind as an obstacle — one which scientists describe as a “digital doomsday.”.

Even if these ideas sound like science fiction, specialists argue that rejection of them would be naively dangerous. History has shown that humanity always underestimated the capabilities of its own inventions — from nuclear energy to biotechnology.

Increasing Public Alarm and Demand for Regulation

Public sentiment is shifting rapidly. A 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that 67% of Americans now support greater government regulation of AI, up from 42% two years earlier. The European Union has already legislatively signed the AI Act into law, establishing the globe’s first extensive regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, while U.S. lawmakers are determining how to follow.

Tech giants, however, are still racing ahead. OpenAI, xAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic are investing billions in “next-generation” AI models that could approach or surpass human-level reasoning.

“We’re in an AI arms race, and everyone wants to be first — but that could also mean being first to make a catastrophic mistake,” warned Richard Branson in a recent statement.

Is It Already Too Late to Stop?

Until now, actual AI superintelligence is still theoretical, although most experts foresee that it might arise in the next two decades if trends continue. The question is not whether or when it will happen, but whether human civilization will be prepared — morally, technically, and legally — when it does.

“The clock is ticking,” declared Yoshua Bengio. “We still have time to make this technology safe. But not much.”

The Bottom Line: Humanity at a Crossroads

The debate over AI superintelligence is no longer confined to labs or tech circles — it has become a global conversation about the future of humanity itself. As generative AI becomes ubiquitous, the next phase could redefine civilization in ways we’re only beginning to imagine.

Whether the Statement on Superintelligence does indeed result in change is yet to be known. But this much is definite: the world has finally realized that the latest technology human beings have ever come up with has the potential to be the most deadly — unless we can learn how to control it before it controls us.

Load More Posts