Techfullnews

Why Every Semi-Truck Has a Mansfield Bar—And Why It Matters

semi trucks/techfullnews

If you’ve ever driven behind a semi-truck, you’ve likely noticed a horizontal bar near the bottom of the trailer, often painted with red and white stripes. This bar, officially known as an underride guard, is a critical safety feature designed to prevent cars from sliding underneath the truck during a collision. While these guards have been mandatory since 1998, their effectiveness has been a topic of debate and ongoing improvement.

In this article, we’ll explore the purpose of underride guards, their history, and why they’re also called Mansfield bars. We’ll also discuss the challenges in making these guards more effective and how they continue to evolve to save lives on the road.


What Are Underride Guards?

The Purpose of Underride Guards

Underride guards are metal bars installed on the rear (and sometimes sides) of semi-truck trailers. Their primary function is to prevent smaller vehicles from sliding underneath the truck during a collision. Without these guards, the high ground clearance of semi-trucks—typically 48 inches—poses a significant risk to passenger vehicles, especially sedans, which can easily wedge beneath the trailer in a crash.

How They Work

In the event of a rear-end collision, the underride guard acts as a barrier, absorbing impact and preventing the car from going under the truck. This reduces the risk of severe injuries or fatalities by ensuring that the car’s crumple zones and airbags can function as intended.


The History of Underride Guards

The Tragic Inspiration: The Mansfield Bar

Underride guards are often referred to as Mansfield bars, named after the tragic death of actress Jayne Mansfield in 1967. Mansfield, a Hollywood star known for her roles in films like The Girl Can’t Help It and Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?, was killed in a horrific accident when her car collided with the rear of a semi-truck.

The car slid underneath the truck’s trailer, crushing the roof and killing Mansfield and two other adults instantly. Her three children, seated in the back, survived the crash. This tragedy shocked the public and led to calls for improved safety measures, ultimately resulting in the mandatory installation of underride guards on semi-trucks.

Regulatory Milestones

  • 1998: Underride guards became mandatory for all semi-trucks in the United States.
  • 2010s: Studies by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) revealed that many underride guards were not strong enough to prevent fatalities, especially in partial head-on collisions.
  • 2017: The IIHS recognized five manufacturers for improving the strength and design of their underride guards.

The Challenges of Underride Guard Effectiveness

Early Shortcomings

Despite their lifesaving potential, early underride guards had significant limitations. The IIHS found that many guards failed to withstand collisions at speeds as low as 35 miles per hour, particularly in partial head-on crashes. Between 2011 and 2015, fatalities from rear-end collisions with semi-trucks increased by 39%, highlighting the need for stronger and more effective designs.

Ongoing Improvements

In response to these findings, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has continued to update safety standards for underride guards. Key areas of improvement include:

  • Increased Strength: Modern guards are designed to withstand higher-impact collisions.
  • Side Guards: Some advocates are pushing for the addition of side underride guards to protect against angled collisions.
  • Adaptive Designs: Engineers are exploring innovative designs to account for varying truck sizes and collision angles.

Why Underride Guards Matter

Saving Lives

Underride guards play a crucial role in reducing the severity of collisions between cars and semi-trucks. By preventing cars from sliding underneath trailers, they help protect passengers from catastrophic injuries.

Protecting Vulnerable Road Users

Smaller vehicles, such as sedans and compact cars, are particularly vulnerable in collisions with semi-trucks. Underride guards ensure that these vehicles have a fighting chance in the event of an accident.

A Symbol of Progress

The evolution of underride guards reflects the ongoing commitment to improving road safety. From the tragic accident that inspired their creation to the continuous advancements in their design, these bars are a testament to the power of innovation in saving lives.


Expert Insights: The Future of Underride Guards

We spoke with Dr. Emily Carter, a transportation safety expert, to get her perspective on the future of underride guards.

“Underride guards have come a long way since their introduction, but there’s still room for improvement. The next frontier is side guards, which could significantly reduce fatalities in angled collisions. As vehicles and roads evolve, so too must our safety measures.”


How You Can Stay Safe on the Road

Tips for Drivers

  1. Maintain a Safe Distance: Keep a safe following distance from semi-trucks to reduce the risk of rear-end collisions.
  2. Stay Alert: Pay attention to the road and avoid distractions, especially when driving near large vehicles.
  3. Advocate for Safety: Support initiatives that promote stronger underride guard standards and the implementation of side guards.

A Lifesaving Legacy

Underride guards, or Mansfield bars, are more than just metal bars on the back of semi-trucks—they are a critical safety feature that has saved countless lives since their introduction. While challenges remain, ongoing advancements in design and regulation ensure that these guards continue to protect drivers and passengers on the road.

As we look to the future, the story of underride guards serves as a reminder of the importance of innovation, regulation, and public advocacy in making our roads safer for everyone.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In late 2023, The Wall Street Journal dropped a bombshell report claiming Tesla’s board had quietly initiated a search for Elon Musk’s successor as CEO. According to anonymous sources familiar with the matter:

  • The board allegedly began the process approximately one month before the report
  • Multiple executive search firms were contacted, with one firm reportedly selected to lead the process
  • Directors supposedly urged Musk to publicly commit more time to Tesla

The timing is critical. This alleged search coincided with:

  • Tesla’s first year-over-year delivery decline since 2020 (8.5% drop in Q1 2024)
  • A 13% decline in annual revenue – the first since 2017
  • Musk’s increasingly polarizing political engagements

Tesla’s Furious Rebuttal and the Credibility Battle

Within hours of publication, Tesla launched an aggressive counterattack:

1. Official Statement from Chair Robyn Denholm:

  • Called the report “absolutely false”
  • Claimed the board remains “highly confident” in Musk’s leadership
  • Alleged the WSJ was informed of this before publication

2. Musk’s Personal Response:

  • Accused WSJ of “EXTREMELY BAD BREACH OF ETHICS”
  • Claimed the paper ignored Tesla’s “unequivocal denial”

Journalistic Standoff:
The WSJ maintains it:

  • Reached out to Musk for comment (received no response)
  • Never received any pre-publication statement from Tesla

This credibility battle raises serious questions about:

  • The independence of Tesla’s board
  • The reliability of anonymous sourcing
  • Musk’s increasingly adversarial relationship with mainstream media

Deep Dive: Tesla’s Board Composition and Governance Concerns

Tesla’s eight-member board has long faced criticism for its close ties to Musk:

Notable Members:

  1. Kimbal Musk (Elon’s brother)
  2. James Murdoch (son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch)
  3. Ira Ehrenpreis (venture capitalist, Tesla director since 2007)
  4. Robyn Denholm (Chair since 2018)

Governance Red Flags:

  • Lack of Independence: 5 of 8 directors have served over 10 years
  • Compensation Controversy: Approved Musk’s $56B pay package (later voided by court)
  • Recent Insider Selling: Denholm sold $50M+ in shares over 90 days

Expert Perspective:
“Tesla’s board fails nearly every test of good corporate governance,” says Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. “The level of entrenchment and lack of independent oversight is unprecedented for a company of this size.”

The Five Critical Challenges Facing Tesla’s Leadership

1. The “Key Person” Risk

Musk isn’t just CEO – he’s Tesla’s:

  • Chief product architect
  • Primary technology visionary
  • Main public spokesperson

Succession Planning Reality:

  • Apple began grooming Tim Cook years before Steve Jobs’ passing
  • Microsoft had Satya Nadella in leadership pipeline before Ballmer’s exit
  • Tesla has no publicly identified successor

2. Musk’s Divided Attention

The billionaire currently oversees:

  • SpaceX (CEO)
  • Neuralink (Founder)
  • The Boring Company (Founder)
  • xAI (Founder)
  • X/Twitter (Owner)

Time Allocation Impact:

  • 2023 analysis shows Musk spent <40% time at Tesla
  • Critical product launches (Cybertruck, Roadster) repeatedly delayed

3. Brand Erosion and Political Polarization

Musk’s recent activities:

  • Endorsed conservative political candidates
  • Acquired Twitter and reinstated banned accounts
  • Made controversial statements on gender, COVID, and other hot-button issues

Consumer Impact:

  • 2023 survey showed 18% drop in brand favorability among Democrats
  • 7% increase among Republicans (showing increasing politicization)

4. Operational Challenges

Production Issues:

  • Cybertruck production at 25% of targets
  • Model 3 Highland refresh delayed in North America

Financial Pressures:

  • Operating margins fell from 19% (2021) to 8% (2023)
  • $18B debt load with rising interest expenses

5. Technological Crossroads

Autonomy Delays:

  • Full Self-Driving (FSD) still at Level 2 after 10+ years
  • Major competitors (Waymo, Cruise) deploying robotaxis

Battery Innovation:

  • 4680 cells not meeting energy density targets
  • Chinese competitors achieving faster charging speeds

Potential Succession Scenarios and Implications

Internal Candidates Analysis

1. Drew Baglino (Former SVP Powertrain & Energy)

  • Strengths: Deep technical expertise, 18-year Tesla veteran
  • Weaknesses: Limited public-facing experience, resigned April 2024

2. Tom Zhu (SVP Automotive)

  • Strengths: Turned around China operations, production expert
  • Weaknesses: Limited autonomy/AI experience

3. Lars Moravy (VP Vehicle Engineering)

  • Strengths: Product development leader, respected internally
  • Weaknesses: Unknown strategic vision

External Possibilities

Wildcard Option:
Could Tesla recruit an auto industry veteran like:

  • Jim Farley (Ford CEO)
  • Herbert Diess (Former VW CEO)

Tech Industry Options:

  • Jennifer Tejada (Former PagerDuty CEO)
  • Gwynne Shotwell (SpaceX COO)

Investor Perspectives: What the Street Is Saying

Bull Case:

  • “Musk is irreplaceable as a tech visionary” – Dan Ives, Wedbush
  • “Succession planning doesn’t equal imminent change” – Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley

Bear Case:

  • “The board has failed shareholders by not planning sooner” – GLJ Research
  • “Tesla needs an operational CEO to complement Musk’s vision” – Bernstein

Institutional Investor Sentiment:

  • Vanguard and BlackRock both supported shareholder proposals for better succession planning
  • 32% of votes favored independent chair proposal in 2023 (up from 26% in 2022)

Historical Precedents: Lessons From Tech Leadership Transitions

Successful Transitions:

  1. Microsoft (Ballmer → Nadella)
    • Key: Clear succession pipeline
    • Result: $500B+ value creation
  2. Apple (Jobs → Cook)
    • Key: Multi-year transition period
    • Result: Maintained innovation while scaling

Failed Transitions:

  1. Uber (Kalanick → Khosrowshahi)
    • Issue: Crisis-driven change
    • Result: Years of instability
  2. WeWork (Neumann → SoftBank takeover)
    • Issue: No planning
    • Result: Near-collapse

The Path Forward: Strategic Recommendations

For Tesla’s Board

  1. Formalize Succession Plan
    • Identify 2-3 internal candidates
    • Establish mentorship program
  2. Enhance Governance
    • Add independent directors
    • Separate Chair/CEO roles
  3. Manage Transparent Communication
    • Public roadmap for leadership development
    • Clear timelines for any transitions

For Investors

  1. Monitor These Key Metrics:
    • Musk’s time allocation (via jet tracking, public appearances)
    • Board refreshment (any new independent appointments)
    • Succession-related disclosures in next proxy statement
  2. Engagement Priorities:
    • Push for formal succession committee
    • Advocate for board independence

Conclusion: Why This Matters Beyond Tesla

The Tesla leadership saga represents a case study in:

  • Founder-led company challenges
  • Board governance in disruptive tech
  • Investor rights in high-growth firms

As Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood recently noted: “The market isn’t pricing in the key person risk at Tesla. When that changes, it could be dramatic.”

The coming months will prove crucial. Will Tesla:

  • Double down on Musk’s leadership?
  • Begin a gradual transition?
  • Face a crisis-driven change?

One thing is certain: How Tesla navigates this challenge will shape not just its future, but the broader conversation about leadership in transformative companies.

Last night, an audacious new automaker named Slate Auto unveiled its first vehicle—a minimalist, no-frills electric truck designed to combat America’s obsession with oversized, overpowered vehicles. With a target price under $20,000 (after incentives), 150 miles of range, and stripped-back design, the Slate Truck is a bold experiment in right-sizing personal transportation.

But will it succeed in a market dominated by monster trucks and SUVs?


Why America’s Obsession With Bigger Trucks Is a Problem

1. The Rise of the “Land Yacht”

  • In 2024, trucks and SUVs made up 75% of new vehicle sales—up from just 50% a decade ago.
  • The average new car now weighs over 5,000 lbs (2.27 tons), with EVs like the Ford F-150 Lightning pushing 6,500 lbs.
  • Bigger vehicles = deadlier roads:
    • Pedestrian deaths surged 57% from 2013–2022 (NHTSA).
    • Trucks with tall hoods (40+ inches) are 44% more lethal (IIHS).

2. The “Compact Truck” Is Nearly Extinct

  • Ford Maverick (2024):
    • 199.7 inches long, 83.5 inches wide
    • Considered “small” by today’s standards
  • Slate Truck:
    • 174.6 inches long, 70.6 inches wide
    • Closer in size to a classic 1985 Toyota pickup

“Our roads are packed with roving land yachts. The Slate Truck is a throwback to when vehicles were sized for humans, not egos.”


Slate Truck: What You Get (And What You Don’t)

✅ The Good: Simple, Affordable, Functional

✔ **20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(49,740).
✔ No Bloatware – No touchscreen, no stereo, no paint (keeps costs down).
✔ Smartphone-Centric – Uses a phone/tablet mount + basic gauge cluster.
✔ Practical Hauling – 1,433 lbs payload, 1,000 lbs towing (enough for most users).

❌ The Trade-Offs

  • 150-Mile Range – Fine for city use, but not for road trips.
  • No Luxury Features – If you want Apple CarPlay or a premium sound system, look elsewhere.
  • Aftermarket Customization Required – Want paint? A stereo? You’ll have to DIY.

Could This Be the Start of a “Small Truck” Revival?

Why the Timing Might Be Right

  • EV Incentives – Federal tax credits could keep prices under $20K.
  • Younger Buyers – Gen Z and Millennials prefer affordability over status symbols.
  • Urban Living – Smaller trucks are easier to park in cities.

The Biggest Challenges

⚠ Consumer Psychology – Will buyers reject a “cheap” truck in a premium-obsessed market?
⚠ Political Risk – A Trump win could kill EV tax credits, raising the price.
⚠ Production Realities – Most EV startups fail. Can Slate deliver by 2026?


Verdict: A Long Shot, But a Necessary One

The Slate Truck isn’t for everyone—but it doesn’t need to be. If even 5% of truck buyers opt for a smaller, cheaper, more efficient alternative, it could shift the auto industry’s trajectory.

Final Question:

Would you drive a $20K electric truck with no frills?

  • Yes, if it saves money!
  • No, I need more power/luxury.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles