Trump, Musk, Altman, and Zuckerberg converge for a summit while a Saudi prince launches an AI venture

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has made a strategic leap into artificial intelligence with the launch of Humain, a state-backed AI company poised to transform the Kingdom’s technological capabilities. This ambitious venture represents more than just another tech startup—it’s a cornerstone of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 plan to diversify its oil-dependent economy and establish itself as a global AI leader.

Inside the Humain Initiative

Infrastructure Development

Massive data center construction across strategic Saudi locations
Cloud computing capabilities to rival global hyperscalers
AI research facilities with cutting-edge hardware

Financial Backing

Funded by Saudi Arabia’s $940 billion Public Investment Fund (PIF)
Part of broader $40 billion AI investment plan announced earlier this year
Positions Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest AI investor

The Geopolitical Context

High-Profile AI Summit Coincidence

The Humain launch coincides with a major U.S.-Saudi investment forum attracting tech titans:

Elon Musk (Tesla, xAI, SpaceX)
Sam Altman (OpenAI)
Mark Zuckerberg (Meta)
President Trump’s scheduled visit to the region

Strategic Partnerships

American tech giants are already engaging with Saudi’s AI ambitions:

Google’s cloud partnership with Saudi Aramco
Salesforce’s Middle East expansion
Microsoft’s $2.1 billion Saudi cloud investment

Why This Matters for Global Tech

1. Shifting AI Power Centers

Saudi Arabia’s move challenges traditional tech hubs, offering:

Alternative funding sources beyond Silicon Valley VCs
Geopolitical neutrality in US-China tech tensions
Energy advantages for power-intensive AI operations

2. Economic Transformation

The PIF’s strategy mirrors successful sovereign wealth plays:

SoftBank Vision Fund model at national scale
Norway’s oil fund approach applied to tech
Singapore’s Temasek -style strategic investing

3. Technology Sovereignty

Humain addresses critical national priorities:

Reducing dependence on foreign tech
Creating high-value domestic jobs
Securing data localization compliance

Challenges and Considerations

Potential Roadblocks

Talent acquisition in competitive global market
Cultural adaptation for international tech workers
Regulatory environment for AI development

Ethical Questions

AI governance in authoritarian context
Surveillance technology concerns
Content moderation approaches

What’s Next for Humain?

Industry analysts predict several likely developments:

Major university partnerships for AI research
Acquisition of niche AI startups
Joint ventures with established tech firms
Saudi-specific AI applications for:
- Arabic language processing
- Islamic finance technology
- Smart city implementations

The Bigger Picture

This move positions Saudi Arabia at the center of three converging trends:

The AI arms race among nations
The petrodollar to tech-dollar transition
Middle East’s emergence as a tech hub

With Humain, MBS isn’t just investing in AI—he’s attempting to future-proof Saudi Arabia’s economy and influence in what may become the most strategically important technology sector of the 21st century.

After a five-year hiatus, Fortnite is back on the US App Store

A program is launched by Meta to promote the adoption of their Llama AI models by companies

Signal’s latest Windows version stops the system from taking chat screenshots

Burnout in PlayStation Stars

Mobile

The Google Play Store lost about half of its apps

by George Mensah 2025-05-01

In a dramatic shift for Android users, the Google Play Store has removed a staggering 1.8 million apps since the start of 2024—47% of its entire catalog—according to new data from Appfigures. This mass exodus reflects Google’s aggressive crackdown on low-quality, spammy, and policy-violating apps, signaling a major shift in how the tech giant manages its digital marketplace.

Key Findings: Why Millions of Apps Got the Boot

Games hit hardest (200,000 removed)
Education apps saw 160,700 deletions
Business apps lost 115,400 listings
Total apps dropped from 3.4M to 1.6M
Apple’s App Store grew slightly (1.6M to 1.64M apps)

Google’s Stance:
“We’re focused on delivering high-quality apps and continuous improvements for user safety,” says spokesperson Dan Jackson.

Behind the Purge: Google’s War on Bad Apps

1. Stricter Review Policies (2023 Onward)

Mandatory 20-person testing for all new apps (2-week minimum)
AI-powered scans detecting copycat/spam apps
Blocked 2.36M policy-violating apps in 2024 alone

2. Targeting “Low-Value” Apps

Google now removes apps with:

Limited functionality (e.g., single-feature calculators)
Deceptive subscriptions
Fake reviews or engagement farming

3. The “Apple Effect”?

While Google purged apps, Apple’s App Store grew by 40,000—likely due to:
✔ Stricter upfront review process
✔ Higher developer fees ($99/year) acting as a filter
✔ Fewer “throwaway” apps in iOS ecosystem

Who’s Affected? Winners & Losers

Losers:

❌ Clone App Developers – Low-effort duplicates are being wiped out
❌ Ad-Farming Apps – Google’s AI now detects fake engagement
❌ “Fleeceware” Scams – Deceptive subscription traps are being banned

Winners:

✅ Legitimate Developers – Less competition from spam apps
✅ Android Users – Higher-quality, safer app ecosystem
✅ Enterprise Apps – Business/education apps surviving purge indicate higher standards

The Bigger Trend: App Stores Are Growing Up

Quality over quantity is now the priority
AI moderation replacing manual reviews
Developer accountability increasing (testing requirements)

Expert Insight:
“This isn’t just a cleanup—it’s a complete repositioning. Google wants Play Store to rival Apple’s curated experience,” says mobile analyst Sarah Chen.

Mobile

Amazon is forced to show tariffs on prices at this time

by George Mensah 2025-05-01

A political firestorm erupted this week after Punchbowl News—a DC outlet known for political scoops but with little tech reporting experience—published a single-sourced rumor that Amazon was considering displaying tariff costs next to product prices. The unverified claim triggered an immediate and aggressive response from the Trump administration, leading to Amazon’s swift denial—and raising serious questions about corporate independence, media integrity, and the true meaning of “free markets.”

How the Drama Unfolded

Punchbowl News reported (without confirmation) that Amazon might start showing tariffs.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was questioned about it at a White House briefing.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt intervened, claiming President Trump called it a “hostile and political act by Amazon.”
Amazon instantly backtracked, with spokesperson Tim Doyle stating the idea was “never approved and is not going to happen.”

Why This Overreaction Matters

No Actual Policy Change Occurred – The White House lashed out at a hypothetical scenario, revealing hypersensitivity to even the suggestion of price transparency.
Tariffs Are a Political Weak Spot – If Amazon displayed tariffs, consumers would see the direct cost of trade policies, undermining the administration’s economic narrative.
Corporate Capitulation – Amazon’s immediate surrender signals how easily even the world’s largest companies bow to political pressure.

Jeff Bezos’ Hypocrisy Problem

The real story here isn’t tariffs—it’s Jeff Bezos’ credibility. The Amazon founder has spent years positioning himself as a free-market champion, even restructuring The Washington Post around “two pillars“:

“Personal liberties and free markets […] Freedom is ethical—it minimizes coercion—and practical—it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.” – Jeff Bezos, 2023

Yet when faced with government intimidation over a mere pricing idea, Amazon folded instantly.

Bezos’ Contradictions

✔ Claims his wealth shields The Post from coercion – Yet Amazon caves to White House pressure.
✔ Preaches free markets – But allows political threats to dictate business decisions.
✔ Promises editorial independence – While The Post’s credibility erodes under his leadership.

If Bezos truly believes in free markets, he must:

Stand up to political bullying and implement transparent pricing.
Allow The Washington Post to critique trade policies without fear.
Prove his principles outweigh shareholder appeasement.

Otherwise, his rhetoric is just empty posturing.

The Bigger Picture: Corporate Power vs. Political Pressure

This incident highlights a disturbing trend:

🔴 Governments strong-arming businesses into compliance.
🔴 Tech giants prioritizing survival over principles.
🔴 Media credibility suffering under billionaire ownership.

What Should Happen Next?

Amazon should call the White House’s bluff and display tariffs anyway.
The Washington Post should investigate the administration’s trade policies aggressively.
Consumers and investors should demand consistency from corporate leaders.

Final Verdict: A Defining Moment for Bezos

Jeff Bezos now faces a leadership test. Will he:

✅ Defend free markets by resisting political intimidation?
❌ Or prove his principles are negotiable when power is at stake?

His next move will reveal whether he’s a true advocate for economic freedom—or just another billionaire playing both sides.

Load More Posts