Techfullnews

Apple might space out the upcoming iPhone models to accommodate a foldable

Apple may stagger next year’s iPhones

Apple is preparing its most significant iPhone release schedule overhaul in years, according to a bombshell report from The Information. The tech giant plans to:

  • Launch its first foldable iPhone alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and “Air” models in fall 2026
  • Delay the standard iPhone 18 until spring 2027 (a first for Apple’s release calendar)
  • Introduce a slimmer “iPhone 17 Air” with a new battery case solution
  • Implement under-display Face ID in Pro models, leaving only a tiny camera cutout

This strategic shift represents Apple’s most dramatic product line reorganization since the introduction of the Plus/Max sizes, signaling a new era of smartphone innovation from Cupertino.

Inside Apple’s Foldable iPhone: Design and Specifications

The Foldable That Will Challenge Samsung’s Dominance

Apple’s first foray into foldables will feature:

Form Factor:

  • Book-style design (like Samsung Galaxy Z Fold) rather than clamshell
  • 5.7-inch external display (comparable to iPhone 13 mini)
  • Just under 8-inch internal display (slightly larger than iPad mini)

Key Innovations:

  • Revolutionary 4.5-4.8mm thickness when unfolded (thinner than current iPads)
  • Face ID implementation (no Touch ID under display)
  • Proprietary hinge mechanism promising “industry-leading durability”

Supply Chain Insights:
Renowned analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggests Apple has been working with suppliers for over three years to perfect the foldable display technology, with LG Display reportedly taking the lead on panel production.

Why Apple Is Shaking Up Its Release Schedule

Managing an Expanding Product Portfolio

With six distinct iPhone models potentially in the lineup by 2026, Apple faces unprecedented complexity:

  1. iPhone 18 Pro Foldable (flagship innovation)
  2. iPhone 18 Pro (traditional premium)
  3. iPhone 18 Air (new slim category)
  4. iPhone 18 (standard model)
  5. iPhone 16E (budget-focused)
  6. iPhone SE (4th gen) (entry-level)

The New Release Cadence:

  • Fall 2026: Foldable, Pro, and Air models debut
  • Spring 2027: Standard iPhone 18 and 16E follow-up launch

This staggered approach helps:

  • Prevent product cannibalization
  • Maintain media buzz throughout the year
  • Allow manufacturing to scale appropriately

The iPhone 17 Air: Apple’s Thinnest Smartphone Yet

Solving the Battery Life Challenge

The Information reveals surprising details about the iPhone 17 Air:

Design Tradeoffs:

  • Ultra-thin profile comes at a cost to battery capacity
  • Internal testing shows battery life “falling short” of previous models

Innovative Solution:

  • Optional smart battery case (sold separately)
  • Case maintains slim profile while extending usage time
  • Potential for MagSafe-compatible modular battery system

Strategic Implications:
This marks Apple’s first acknowledgment that thinness may have reached practical limits for daily use, prompting creative accessory solutions.

Under-Display Face ID: The Next Step in Apple’s Bezel-Free Journey

The iPhone 18 Pro’s Nearly All-Screen Future

Apple’s display technology is taking another leap forward:

Current State:

  • Dynamic Island (iPhone 14 Pro/15 Pro)
  • Smaller pill-shaped cutout

2026 Evolution:

  • Face ID sensors move completely under display
  • Only front-facing camera remains visible
  • Tiny hole-punch in top-left corner (similar to some Android flagships)

Why This Matters:

  • Represents the final step toward a truly all-screen iPhone
  • Maintains Face ID security while maximizing display real estate
  • Potentially enables always-on display functionality

Competitive Landscape: How Apple’s Moves Stack Up

Foldable Market Readiness

While Samsung has led the foldable market since 2019, Apple’s entry could:

  • Validate the foldable category for mainstream consumers
  • Drive rapid improvements in durability standards
  • Potentially double the global foldable market size by 2027

Price Point Expectations:
Analysts predict Apple’s foldable could command a $1,999 starting price, significantly above current Android foldables but with premium materials and ecosystem integration.

What This Means for Consumers and Investors

Consumer Implications:

  • More choices across price points and form factors
  • Potential for greater differentiation between models
  • New accessory ecosystem opportunities

Investor Considerations:

  • Higher ASP (average selling price) potential with foldable
  • Possible margin pressures from new technology adoption
  • Watch for supply chain developments in 2025

The Road Ahead: Key Milestones to Watch

2024:

  • iPhone 16 series launch (potential first glimpse of direction)
  • Possible foldable prototype leaks

2025:

  • Supply chain confirmation of foldable production
  • Developer kit releases for foldable-specific software

2026:

  • Foldable iPhone announcement (likely September event)
  • iOS features specifically optimized for foldables

Conclusion: Apple’s Most Ambitious iPhone Strategy Yet

This reported roadmap represents Tim Cook’s most aggressive product strategy since taking the helm, showing Apple’s willingness to:

  1. Embrace new form factors after years of watching the foldable market
  2. Disrupt its own release calendar to better manage product complexity
  3. Push display technology boundaries with under-screen innovations
  4. Address practical limitations with creative accessory solutions

While Android manufacturers have pioneered many of these concepts, Apple’s methodical approach and ecosystem advantages could finally bring foldables and advanced display tech to the mainstream.

The coming years will prove whether this bold strategy can maintain Apple’s industry-leading position or if the company has stretched its iPhone lineup too far. One thing is certain – the smartphone landscape is about to get much more interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In a dramatic shift for Android users, the Google Play Store has removed a staggering 1.8 million apps since the start of 2024—47% of its entire catalog—according to new data from Appfigures. This mass exodus reflects Google’s aggressive crackdown on low-quality, spammy, and policy-violating apps, signaling a major shift in how the tech giant manages its digital marketplace.

Key Findings: Why Millions of Apps Got the Boot

  • Games hit hardest (200,000 removed)
  • Education apps saw 160,700 deletions
  • Business apps lost 115,400 listings
  • Total apps dropped from 3.4M to 1.6M
  • Apple’s App Store grew slightly (1.6M to 1.64M apps)

Google’s Stance:
“We’re focused on delivering high-quality apps and continuous improvements for user safety,” says spokesperson Dan Jackson.


Behind the Purge: Google’s War on Bad Apps

1. Stricter Review Policies (2023 Onward)

  • Mandatory 20-person testing for all new apps (2-week minimum)
  • AI-powered scans detecting copycat/spam apps
  • Blocked 2.36M policy-violating apps in 2024 alone

2. Targeting “Low-Value” Apps

Google now removes apps with:

  • Limited functionality (e.g., single-feature calculators)
  • Deceptive subscriptions
  • Fake reviews or engagement farming

3. The “Apple Effect”?

While Google purged apps, Apple’s App Store grew by 40,000—likely due to:
✔ Stricter upfront review process
✔ Higher developer fees ($99/year) acting as a filter
✔ Fewer “throwaway” apps in iOS ecosystem


Who’s Affected? Winners & Losers

Losers:

❌ Clone App Developers – Low-effort duplicates are being wiped out
❌ Ad-Farming Apps – Google’s AI now detects fake engagement
❌ “Fleeceware” Scams – Deceptive subscription traps are being banned

Winners:

✅ Legitimate Developers – Less competition from spam apps
✅ Android Users – Higher-quality, safer app ecosystem
✅ Enterprise Apps – Business/education apps surviving purge indicate higher standards


The Bigger Trend: App Stores Are Growing Up

  • Quality over quantity is now the priority
  • AI moderation replacing manual reviews
  • Developer accountability increasing (testing requirements)

Expert Insight:
“This isn’t just a cleanup—it’s a complete repositioning. Google wants Play Store to rival Apple’s curated experience,” says mobile analyst Sarah Chen.

A political firestorm erupted this week after Punchbowl News—a DC outlet known for political scoops but with little tech reporting experience—published a single-sourced rumor that Amazon was considering displaying tariff costs next to product prices. The unverified claim triggered an immediate and aggressive response from the Trump administration, leading to Amazon’s swift denial—and raising serious questions about corporate independence, media integrity, and the true meaning of “free markets.”

How the Drama Unfolded

  1. Punchbowl News reported (without confirmation) that Amazon might start showing tariffs.
  2. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was questioned about it at a White House briefing.
  3. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt intervened, claiming President Trump called it a “hostile and political act by Amazon.”
  4. Amazon instantly backtracked, with spokesperson Tim Doyle stating the idea was “never approved and is not going to happen.”

Why This Overreaction Matters

  • No Actual Policy Change Occurred – The White House lashed out at a hypothetical scenario, revealing hypersensitivity to even the suggestion of price transparency.
  • Tariffs Are a Political Weak Spot – If Amazon displayed tariffs, consumers would see the direct cost of trade policies, undermining the administration’s economic narrative.
  • Corporate Capitulation – Amazon’s immediate surrender signals how easily even the world’s largest companies bow to political pressure.

Jeff Bezos’ Hypocrisy Problem

The real story here isn’t tariffs—it’s Jeff Bezos’ credibility. The Amazon founder has spent years positioning himself as a free-market champion, even restructuring The Washington Post around “two pillars“:

“Personal liberties and free markets […] Freedom is ethical—it minimizes coercion—and practical—it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.” – Jeff Bezos, 2023

Yet when faced with government intimidation over a mere pricing idea, Amazon folded instantly.

Bezos’ Contradictions

✔ Claims his wealth shields The Post from coercion – Yet Amazon caves to White House pressure.
✔ Preaches free markets – But allows political threats to dictate business decisions.
✔ Promises editorial independence – While The Post’s credibility erodes under his leadership.

If Bezos truly believes in free markets, he must:

  • Stand up to political bullying and implement transparent pricing.
  • Allow The Washington Post to critique trade policies without fear.
  • Prove his principles outweigh shareholder appeasement.

Otherwise, his rhetoric is just empty posturing.

The Bigger Picture: Corporate Power vs. Political Pressure

This incident highlights a disturbing trend:

🔴 Governments strong-arming businesses into compliance.
🔴 Tech giants prioritizing survival over principles.
🔴 Media credibility suffering under billionaire ownership.

What Should Happen Next?

  • Amazon should call the White House’s bluff and display tariffs anyway.
  • The Washington Post should investigate the administration’s trade policies aggressively.
  • Consumers and investors should demand consistency from corporate leaders.

Final Verdict: A Defining Moment for Bezos

Jeff Bezos now faces a leadership test. Will he:

✅ Defend free markets by resisting political intimidation?
❌ Or prove his principles are negotiable when power is at stake?

His next move will reveal whether he’s a true advocate for economic freedom—or just another billionaire playing both sides.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles