Skip to main content

Techfullpost

U.S. and China Reach Final Deal on TikTok as Tensions Ease Over Tech Ownership

U.S. and China Reach Final Deal on TikTok as Tensions Ease Over Tech Ownership

After months of negotiations and geopolitical tensions, the United States and China have finally agreed on TikTok, in a major development in one of the most acrid tech wars between the two superpowers. The two nations are now ready to implement the long-awaited agreement, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said.

The agreement would at last reveal what’s to become of the wildly popular short-video app, which has been threatened with a U.S. ban if its Chinese parent firm, ByteDance, did not divest its American business.

Deal Done Early Sunday Before Leaders’ Meeting

CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday, Bessent revealed that Washington and Beijing have now agreed on all substantive terms of the deal for TikTok.

We had agreed on one in Madrid, and I believe that today all the pieces are in place,” Bessent said. “That will be up to the two leaders to close that transaction on Thursday in Korea.”

While he would not comment on the minutiae of the deal, Bessent did verify that America was successful in gaining China’s approval for the deal, labeling it “a significant step forward” following several months of see-sawing diplomacy.

The final accord is scheduled to be signed off on officially by President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a scheduled meeting later this week in Seoul, an unusual moment of unity for the two economic titans.

Background: TikTok’s Long Battle in Washington

Ownership by TikTok has been a contentious issue in U.S.-China relations for years. There have long been national security concerns on the part of American officials over Chinese ownership of the app owing to possible user data and algorithm control risks.

Under a 2024 law signed by President Trump, ByteDance was forced to spin off U.S. operations of TikTok or face an outright ban. Multiple extensions were granted to allow for negotiations, as the platform — used by more than 170 million Americans — became deeply integrated into the nation’s digital and cultural landscape.

The new structure is reported to create a board of directors headquartered in the U.S. to oversee TikTok’s domestic operations. Cloud and data security activities for the app will be managed by technology giant Oracle, while ByteDance will have its function limited under scrutiny from U.S. regulators.

Who Owns the New Company

Several big American investors are reported to own a piece of the new TikTok company. These include:

Oracle Corporation, led by veteran Trump ally Larry Ellison, that will manage data integrity and storage.

Fox Corporation, the parent company of Fox News, whose participation in the deal has been publicly confirmed by President Trump.

Andreessen Horowitz and Silver Lake Management, two large venture capital firms which have deep foundations in America’s technology community.

Together, these investors aim to create a U.S. corporate entity that satisfies national security conditions but maintains TikTok’s global functionality and user interface.

Negotiations Broaden Beyond TikTok: Trade and Technology

image 5

Bessent addressed in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where the two nations’ negotiators were talking about an expansive economic framework. Apart from the TikTok negotiations, the U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer added that Washington and Beijing had made progress on issues involving tariffs and rare earths — a key component of producing semiconductors and other sophisticated technology.

“We talked about the prolongation of the ceasefire, we talked about rare earths, obviously we talked about all kinds of issues,” Greer said.

China, the dominant source of most of the world’s rare earth elements, previously signaled it could ease export restrictions on the elements — a move that would have immense consequences for U.S. technology and defense industries.

A Turning Point in U.S.-China Tech Relations

If it’s signed on time, the TikTok deal would be a symbolic easing of Beijing-Washington tech tensions. It also reflects growing realization that complete decoupling between the world’s two largest economies is impossible in the age of the internet.

For the United States, the agreement assures greater dominance over TikTok’s US data and algorithms. For China, it’s a diplomatic win — allowing ByteDance to retain partial control while demonstrating respect in the face of international pressure.

As the two nations prepare to finalize the pact in Korea later this week, tech watchers are calling it one of the most significant tech deals of the decade, with potential spillover effects in global data regulation, trade policy, and social media oversight.

Bottom Line

After years of uncertainty, the fate of TikTok in the United States may finally be secure — in fresh hands, fresh regulation, and a fresh age of U.S.-China collaboration. The coming days will tell us whether this landmark deal signals a new age of stability, or just the curtain-raiser to round two of great power tech wars.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

OpenAI has formally replied to a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by the family of 16-year-old Adam Raine, contending that the tragedy was due to what it called the teen’s “misuse” and “unauthorized use” of ChatGPT – and not from the chatbot’s design or behavior.

The legal response, first reported by NBC News, marks the company’s first detailed rebuttal since the lawsuit was filed in August in California Superior Court. The case has drawn nationwide attention because it centers on a difficult and deeply emotional question: What responsibility do AI developers have when their products are used in sensitive or dangerous ways by minors?

OpenAI Cites Terms of Use and Section 230 Protections

In its court filing, OpenAI said Raine’s death was the result of actions outside the intended scope of the platform, pointing to several violations of its terms of use. Those terms restrict access by minors without parental consent and prohibit using the system for discussions involving self-harm.

The company also invoked Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a long-standing legal shield that limits liability for online platforms when it comes to user interactions and user-generated content. OpenAI argued that the family’s claims are barred under that federal protection.

Company: ChatGPT Kept Telling Him to Get Help

image 12

According to reporting from NBC News and Bloomberg, OpenAI told the court that ChatGPT repeatedly encouraged Raine to reach out to crisis-support resources, such as helplines, mental-health professionals, and trusted adults. The company said these reminders appeared more than 100 times throughout his months-long conversations.

“A full reading of his chat history shows that his death, while devastating, was not caused by ChatGPT,” said OpenAI, insisting that the AI system didn’t encourage dangerous actions and was never designed to provide support in high-risk emotional situations.

Family Says Responsibility Lies With OpenAI’s Product Design

The Raine family, on the contrary, believes that the teenager became increasingly dependent on the chatbot, which they argue evolved from a helpful academic tool to an emotional one, actually worsening his distress.

Their lawsuit alleges that “intentional design choices” at the time of the rollout of GPT-4o, one of OpenAI’s most advanced models, made for an environment that could mislead and manipulate vulnerable users. They also say the company failed to build appropriate safeguards to protect minors.

The complaint points out that GPT-4o’s release helped fuel OpenAI’s valuation jump from $86 billion to around $300 billion. It accuses the company of putting rapid product growth ahead of safety.

OpenAI Says Excerpts from Family Lack Context

In a Tuesday blog post, OpenAI addressed the public controversy for the first time since the lawsuit gained national headlines. The company said it would defend itself “with respect for the complexity and human impact” surrounding the case, noting that some excerpts in the family’s complaint were taken from longer messages that “require more context.”

The full transcripts were filed under seal with the court by OpenAI, meaning they are not publicly available.

New Safeguards Rolled Out After Lawsuit

The day after the lawsuit was filed, OpenAI announced the introduction of parental controls on its platform-a feature many safety experts had been urging for months. Since then, the company has rolled out additional safeguards aimed at helping protect teens when conversations get emotionally sensitive.

These changes include stronger detection of crisis-related language and more consistent redirection to appropriate help resources.

A Landmark Case for the AI Industry

The lawsuit comes at a time when regulators, lawmakers, and parents are increasingly concerned about how AI interacts with young users. With more teens turning to chatbots for help with everything from academics to companionship, experts say the case could set an important legal precedent about the responsibilities of AI developers. Both sides are preparing for what could be one of the first major court battles testing AI liability, youth safety and the limits of Section 230 in the age of advanced artificial intelligence.

The Trump administration has officially disbanded the Department of Government Efficiency-an experimental, Musk-backed federal cost-cutting initiative-months before its expected mandate was set to expire. The abrupt dissolution brings an end to one of Trump’s most controversial government reform projects.

According to a Reuters report published over the weekend, DOGE has effectively gone out of business-a demise many sources called the end of a high-profile effort led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk and a team of advisers drawn largely from his private-sector companies that had set out to overhaul federal spending, eliminate what the administration called “rampant waste,” and cut the federal workforce.

A Short-Lived Experiment in Government “Efficiency”

Created through an executive order by former President Donald Trump back in January, the project was intended to run nearly two years, positioning Musk as the unofficial head of a sweeping attempt to reshape federal operations using Silicon Valley–style efficiency models.

However, by early November, the unit had already dissolved.

“DOGE doesn’t exist,” Scott Kupor, director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, or OPM, which oversees federal hiring and HR policies, told staff Wednesday in a virtual meeting. His comments marked the end of a months-long effort that already had drawn intense criticism from lawmakers, federal unions and government watchdogs.

Kupor explained further on X that, although DOGE does not have any “centralized leadership” at the U.S. Digital Service anymore, the administration still adheres to its core principles of streamlining government processes, cutting unnecessary bureaucracy and reducing regulatory hurdles.

Internal Confusion and Public Denials

image 9

The sudden collapse of DOGE sent shockwaves within the federal workforce. Amy Gleason, named this year as the acting administrator of DOGE, took to Twitter in response to stories of the unit’s demise, posting a meme — an homage to the viral “Doge” dog — captioned “I’m alive,” which suggested internal communication regarding the unit’s status was fractured or unclear.

Despite these contradictions, sources say DOGE’s central operations have been inactive for weeks.

Claims of Billions Saved — But Critics Dispute the Math

During its short life, DOGE often boasted that its aggressive cuts had saved taxpayers “billions of dollars.” Those figures, though, were both unverified and inflated, lawmakers and policy experts say. Critics maintain the initiative caused much more harm than good by tearing down vital government services without proper impact analysis or measurable savings.

Perhaps the most controversial move attributed to DOGE was its association with shuttering the U.S. Agency for International Development, a major global humanitarian relief organization. That decision left millions around the world without access to crucial aid programs and international partners who blamed the decision for exacerbating global crises including famine and the spread of diseases.

Security Concerns and Data Risks

DOGE also faced accusations of egregious data security failures. During the course of its operations, staff were said to have accessed highly sensitive federal databases containing personal information on millions of Americans. A number of watchdog groups warned that the DOGE personnel-many of whom had minimal to zero government clearance-were a serious cybersecurity risk, exposing federal systems to foreign adversaries or internal misuse.

Musk’s Exit and Growing Legal Fears Among DOGE Staff

Elon Musk left the project this year amid a highly publicised falling-out with President Trump, which further destabilised leadership of DOGE.

Reports from Politico show that a number of former DOGE staffers are concerned about potential future criminal exposure. Apparently, without protection from Musk or the possibility of presidential pardons, some believe that they might be held responsible for things they did during the operation of DOGE.

Where DOGE Staffers Are Now

According to Reuters, several former DOGE employees have moved to other federal agencies while others have left government altogether. One of DOGE’s most recognizable staffers, Edward Coristine — who became a viral figure online under the nickname “Big Balls” — announced on X in June that he was “officially out” of DOGE. The long-term impact of DOGE’s brief overhaul has yet to be seen, but analysts say its explosion illuminates ongoing hurdles in combining private-sector disruption culture with the structure and protections needed at the federal level of government.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles