Techfullpost

Mind-Blowing Satellite Secrets Revealed: XRISM and Moon Sniper’s Epic Mission

Satellite Secrets Revealed

A groundbreaking satellite aimed at revolutionizing our understanding of celestial objects, and a lunar lander known as the “Moon Sniper,” embarked on a momentous journey on Wednesday night.

The Japanese Space Agency (JAXA) launch, after several weather-related delays, took place aboard an H-IIA rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center at 7:42 p.m. ET on Wednesday or 8:42 a.m. Japan Standard Time on Thursday.

The event was streamed live on JAXA’s YouTube channel, providing viewers with broadcasts in both English and Japanese.

The satellite, officially named XRISM (pronounced “crism”), short for X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission, is a collaborative endeavor between JAXA and NASA, with contributions from the European Space Agency and Canadian Space Agency.

Accompanying XRISM is JAXA’s SLIM, or Smart Lander for Investigating Moon. This compact lunar lander is engineered to demonstrate an extremely precise landing within 100 meters (328 feet), as opposed to the typical kilometer range, utilizing high-precision landing technology. This remarkable precision earned the mission its moniker, “Moon Sniper.”

According to NASA, the satellite and its two instruments will focus on observing the universe’s hottest regions, largest structures, and objects with the most substantial gravitational forces. XRISM’s primary function is to detect X-ray light, a wavelength that is invisible to the human eye.

X-rays are emitted by some of the most energetic objects and events in the cosmos, which is why astronomers are eager to study them.

The satellite is equipped with thousands of curved, nested mirrors specifically designed for detecting X-rays, in contrast to other wavelengths of light. Upon reaching orbit, XRISM will require several months of calibration. The mission is designed to operate for three years.

XRISM is capable of detecting X-rays with energies ranging from 400 to 12,000 electron volts, significantly beyond the energy levels of visible light, which typically ranges from 2 to 3 electron volts, according to NASA. This broad range of detection will enable the study of cosmic phenomena across the universe.

The satellite houses two instruments: Resolve and Xtend. Resolve tracks minute temperature fluctuations to determine the source, composition, motion, and physical state of X-rays. Resolve operates at a chilling temperature of minus 459.58 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 273.10 degrees Celsius), approximately 50 times colder than deep space, thanks to a container of liquid helium.

This instrument will enable astronomers to unlock the mysteries of cosmic phenomena, including the chemical details of hot gas within galactic clusters.

Meanwhile, Xtend provides XRISM with one of the most extensive fields of view on an X-ray satellite.

“The spectra XRISM collects will be the most detailed we’ve ever seen for some of the phenomena we’ll observe,” said Brian Williams, NASA’s XRISM project scientist at Goddard. “The mission will provide us with insights into some of the most difficult places to study, like the internal structures of neutron stars and near-light-speed particle jets powered by black holes in active galaxies.”

In parallel, SLIM will employ its own propulsion system to embark on a journey toward the moon. The spacecraft will reach lunar orbit approximately three to four months after launch, orbit the moon for one month, and then begin its descent, aiming for a soft landing within four to six months after launch. If the lander achieves its goal, it will also conduct a brief study of the lunar surface.

Unlike recent lunar lander missions that have targeted the moon’s south pole, SLIM has set its sights on a location near a small lunar impact crater called Shioli, near the Sea of Nectar. Here, it will investigate rock compositions that could help scientists uncover the moon’s origins. The chosen landing site is just south of the Sea of Tranquility, where Apollo 11 made its historic landing near the moon’s equator in 1969.

Achieving precise landings on the moon is a significant goal for JAXA and other space agencies, particularly in resource-rich areas such as the lunar south pole, where permanently shadowed regions contain water ice, and numerous hazards like craters and rocks must be navigated. Future missions will require pinpoint landings to avoid these obstacles.

Moreover, SLIM’s lightweight design holds promise for agencies planning more frequent missions and exploring the moons of other planets, such as Mars. If SLIM achieves its objectives, JAXA believes it will revolutionize missions from “landing where we can” to “landing where we want.”

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

Google has introduced a refreshed version of its iconic multicolored “G” logo, marking the first significant update in nearly a decade. This subtle yet impactful redesign transitions the familiar red, yellow, green, and blue hues into a seamless gradient, aligning with modern design trends and the company’s evolving visual identity.

A Modern Twist on a Classic Brand Symbol

The new gradient “G” logo was first spotted in an update to the Google app on iOS and Pixel devices, as reported by 9to5Google. Unlike the previous version, which featured distinct color blocks, the updated design blends the four primary colors smoothly, creating a more dynamic and contemporary look.

This change follows Google’s last major logo overhaul in September 2015, when the company shifted to a sans-serif typeface and introduced a simplified “G” emblem that retained its signature color scheme. While the latest update is more understated, it reflects Google’s ongoing commitment to a cohesive and forward-thinking brand aesthetic.

Why the Gradient Shift? Aligning with Google’s Broader Design Language

The new gradient treatment isn’t just a stylistic choice—it’s a strategic alignment with Google’s broader design philosophy. Notably, the updated “G” now mirrors the gradient used in the Gemini logo (Google’s AI-powered assistant), reinforcing brand consistency across products.

Key Observations About the Logo Update:

  • Currently Limited Rollout: The gradient “G” is only visible on iOS and Pixel phones as of now. The traditional block-colored version remains on the web and most Android devices.
  • Subtle Yet Meaningful: While the change may seem minor, it signals Google’s focus on modernization and adaptability in its branding.
  • Potential Wider Implementation: If this update follows Google’s past patterns, we may see the gradient logo expand to other platforms soon.

What This Means for Google’s Brand Identity

Google’s logo evolution reflects its commitment to innovation while maintaining brand recognition. The gradient effect adds a touch of sophistication, making the logo feel more integrated with today’s digital design trends.

Why This Matters for Users & Marketers:

  • Visual Continuity: A unified logo style strengthens brand recall.
  • Adaptive Design: The gradient may hint at future design changes across Google’s ecosystem.
  • AI & Brand Synergy: The resemblance to Gemini’s logo suggests deeper integration of AI into Google’s identity.

Final Thoughts: A Sign of More Changes to Come?

While this logo tweak is subtle, it could be the beginning of a broader refresh for Google’s visual branding. As the company continues to innovate—especially in AI and machine learning—its logo may evolve further to represent its cutting-edge advancements.

For now, users can spot the new gradient “G” on select devices, keeping an eye out for potential expansions to other platforms. One thing is clear: Google remains deliberate in its branding, ensuring every change serves a purpose.

The future of Mozilla Firefox hangs in the balance as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) pushes for sweeping restrictions on Google’s search monopoly. Eric Muhlheim, Mozilla’s Chief Financial Officer, testified in court that the proposed remedies—including banning Google from paying to be the default search engine in third-party browsers—could devastate Firefox’s revenue and potentially force it out of business.

Why Firefox’s Survival Is at Risk

Firefox, the only major browser not controlled by a tech giant, relies heavily on its partnership with Google. According to Muhlheim:

  • 90% of Mozilla’s revenue comes from Firefox.
  • 85% of that revenue is tied to its Google search deal.

If the court enforces the DOJ’s demands, Mozilla would face immediate financial turmoil, leading to deep cuts in engineering, innovation, and user experience improvements. This could trigger a “downward spiral”, making Firefox less competitive and accelerating its decline.

The Domino Effect on Web Competition

The Loss of Gecko: A Threat to an Open Web

Firefox’s Gecko engine is the only independent browser engine not owned by Apple (WebKit) or Google (Chromium). If Firefox collapses:

  • Big Tech’s control over the web grows stronger—exactly what antitrust regulators are trying to prevent.
  • Fewer choices for users—reducing competition in browser innovation and privacy features.
  • Less funding for Mozilla’s nonprofit initiatives, including open-source web tools and AI-driven climate research.

Why Switching to Bing (or Another Search Engine) Isn’t a Viable Solution

Mozilla has explored alternatives, but the reality is grim:

  • Bing doesn’t monetize searches as effectively as Google, meaning lower revenue share for Mozilla.
  • Past experiments with Yahoo as the default led to mass user abandonment.
  • Without Google’s bids, Mozilla would have less leverage in negotiations, further reducing income.

The DOJ’s Dilemma: Fixing Google’s Monopoly Without Killing Competitors

The DOJ’s goal is noble—breaking Google’s stranglehold on search—but the unintended consequences could be catastrophic. If Firefox disappears:

✅ Google Chrome’s dominance grows—fewer competitors mean less incentive for privacy and performance improvements.
✅ Apple’s Safari remains the only alternative, further consolidating power in the hands of tech giants.
✅ Innovation suffers—Firefox has been a pioneer in privacy features like Enhanced Tracking Protection.

Can Mozilla Survive Without Google’s Money?

Muhlheim’s testimony paints a bleak picture:

“We would be really struggling to stay alive… waiting on a hypothetical future where more search competitors emerge.”

The harsh truth? Regulators must act carefully—if they dismantle Google’s monopoly too aggressively, they might inadvertently strengthen it by eliminating its biggest rival.

The Path Forward: Balancing Antitrust Enforcement & Browser Survival

To preserve a diverse, competitive web, regulators should consider:

  1. Phasing out Google’s default deals gradually—giving Mozilla time to adapt.
  2. Mandating revenue-sharing transparency—ensuring fair competition in search monetization.
  3. Supporting independent browsers—through grants or antitrust settlement funds.

Final Thoughts: Why Firefox’s Survival Matters

Firefox is more than just a browser—it’s a guardian of an open, decentralized internet. If it falls, the web becomes a duopoly of Google and Apple, with fewer choices for users and developers.

The DOJ’s case against Google is necessary, but the remedy must protect competitors, not destroy them. Otherwise, the cure could be worse than the disease.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles