Techfullpost

U.S. and China Reach Final Deal on TikTok as Tensions Ease Over Tech Ownership

U.S. and China Reach Final Deal on TikTok as Tensions Ease Over Tech Ownership

After months of negotiations and geopolitical tensions, the United States and China have finally agreed on TikTok, in a major development in one of the most acrid tech wars between the two superpowers. The two nations are now ready to implement the long-awaited agreement, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said.

The agreement would at last reveal what’s to become of the wildly popular short-video app, which has been threatened with a U.S. ban if its Chinese parent firm, ByteDance, did not divest its American business.

Deal Done Early Sunday Before Leaders’ Meeting

CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday, Bessent revealed that Washington and Beijing have now agreed on all substantive terms of the deal for TikTok.

We had agreed on one in Madrid, and I believe that today all the pieces are in place,” Bessent said. “That will be up to the two leaders to close that transaction on Thursday in Korea.”

While he would not comment on the minutiae of the deal, Bessent did verify that America was successful in gaining China’s approval for the deal, labeling it “a significant step forward” following several months of see-sawing diplomacy.

The final accord is scheduled to be signed off on officially by President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a scheduled meeting later this week in Seoul, an unusual moment of unity for the two economic titans.

Background: TikTok’s Long Battle in Washington

Ownership by TikTok has been a contentious issue in U.S.-China relations for years. There have long been national security concerns on the part of American officials over Chinese ownership of the app owing to possible user data and algorithm control risks.

Under a 2024 law signed by President Trump, ByteDance was forced to spin off U.S. operations of TikTok or face an outright ban. Multiple extensions were granted to allow for negotiations, as the platform — used by more than 170 million Americans — became deeply integrated into the nation’s digital and cultural landscape.

The new structure is reported to create a board of directors headquartered in the U.S. to oversee TikTok’s domestic operations. Cloud and data security activities for the app will be managed by technology giant Oracle, while ByteDance will have its function limited under scrutiny from U.S. regulators.

Who Owns the New Company

Several big American investors are reported to own a piece of the new TikTok company. These include:

Oracle Corporation, led by veteran Trump ally Larry Ellison, that will manage data integrity and storage.

Fox Corporation, the parent company of Fox News, whose participation in the deal has been publicly confirmed by President Trump.

Andreessen Horowitz and Silver Lake Management, two large venture capital firms which have deep foundations in America’s technology community.

Together, these investors aim to create a U.S. corporate entity that satisfies national security conditions but maintains TikTok’s global functionality and user interface.

Negotiations Broaden Beyond TikTok: Trade and Technology

Bessent addressed in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where the two nations’ negotiators were talking about an expansive economic framework. Apart from the TikTok negotiations, the U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer added that Washington and Beijing had made progress on issues involving tariffs and rare earths — a key component of producing semiconductors and other sophisticated technology.

“We talked about the prolongation of the ceasefire, we talked about rare earths, obviously we talked about all kinds of issues,” Greer said.

China, the dominant source of most of the world’s rare earth elements, previously signaled it could ease export restrictions on the elements — a move that would have immense consequences for U.S. technology and defense industries.

A Turning Point in U.S.-China Tech Relations

If it’s signed on time, the TikTok deal would be a symbolic easing of Beijing-Washington tech tensions. It also reflects growing realization that complete decoupling between the world’s two largest economies is impossible in the age of the internet.

For the United States, the agreement assures greater dominance over TikTok’s US data and algorithms. For China, it’s a diplomatic win — allowing ByteDance to retain partial control while demonstrating respect in the face of international pressure.

As the two nations prepare to finalize the pact in Korea later this week, tech watchers are calling it one of the most significant tech deals of the decade, with potential spillover effects in global data regulation, trade policy, and social media oversight.

Bottom Line

After years of uncertainty, the fate of TikTok in the United States may finally be secure — in fresh hands, fresh regulation, and a fresh age of U.S.-China collaboration. The coming days will tell us whether this landmark deal signals a new age of stability, or just the curtain-raiser to round two of great power tech wars.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

Google has introduced a refreshed version of its iconic multicolored “G” logo, marking the first significant update in nearly a decade. This subtle yet impactful redesign transitions the familiar red, yellow, green, and blue hues into a seamless gradient, aligning with modern design trends and the company’s evolving visual identity.

A Modern Twist on a Classic Brand Symbol

The new gradient “G” logo was first spotted in an update to the Google app on iOS and Pixel devices, as reported by 9to5Google. Unlike the previous version, which featured distinct color blocks, the updated design blends the four primary colors smoothly, creating a more dynamic and contemporary look.

This change follows Google’s last major logo overhaul in September 2015, when the company shifted to a sans-serif typeface and introduced a simplified “G” emblem that retained its signature color scheme. While the latest update is more understated, it reflects Google’s ongoing commitment to a cohesive and forward-thinking brand aesthetic.

Why the Gradient Shift? Aligning with Google’s Broader Design Language

The new gradient treatment isn’t just a stylistic choice—it’s a strategic alignment with Google’s broader design philosophy. Notably, the updated “G” now mirrors the gradient used in the Gemini logo (Google’s AI-powered assistant), reinforcing brand consistency across products.

Key Observations About the Logo Update:

  • Currently Limited Rollout: The gradient “G” is only visible on iOS and Pixel phones as of now. The traditional block-colored version remains on the web and most Android devices.
  • Subtle Yet Meaningful: While the change may seem minor, it signals Google’s focus on modernization and adaptability in its branding.
  • Potential Wider Implementation: If this update follows Google’s past patterns, we may see the gradient logo expand to other platforms soon.

What This Means for Google’s Brand Identity

Google’s logo evolution reflects its commitment to innovation while maintaining brand recognition. The gradient effect adds a touch of sophistication, making the logo feel more integrated with today’s digital design trends.

Why This Matters for Users & Marketers:

  • Visual Continuity: A unified logo style strengthens brand recall.
  • Adaptive Design: The gradient may hint at future design changes across Google’s ecosystem.
  • AI & Brand Synergy: The resemblance to Gemini’s logo suggests deeper integration of AI into Google’s identity.

Final Thoughts: A Sign of More Changes to Come?

While this logo tweak is subtle, it could be the beginning of a broader refresh for Google’s visual branding. As the company continues to innovate—especially in AI and machine learning—its logo may evolve further to represent its cutting-edge advancements.

For now, users can spot the new gradient “G” on select devices, keeping an eye out for potential expansions to other platforms. One thing is clear: Google remains deliberate in its branding, ensuring every change serves a purpose.

The future of Mozilla Firefox hangs in the balance as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) pushes for sweeping restrictions on Google’s search monopoly. Eric Muhlheim, Mozilla’s Chief Financial Officer, testified in court that the proposed remedies—including banning Google from paying to be the default search engine in third-party browsers—could devastate Firefox’s revenue and potentially force it out of business.

Why Firefox’s Survival Is at Risk

Firefox, the only major browser not controlled by a tech giant, relies heavily on its partnership with Google. According to Muhlheim:

  • 90% of Mozilla’s revenue comes from Firefox.
  • 85% of that revenue is tied to its Google search deal.

If the court enforces the DOJ’s demands, Mozilla would face immediate financial turmoil, leading to deep cuts in engineering, innovation, and user experience improvements. This could trigger a “downward spiral”, making Firefox less competitive and accelerating its decline.

The Domino Effect on Web Competition

The Loss of Gecko: A Threat to an Open Web

Firefox’s Gecko engine is the only independent browser engine not owned by Apple (WebKit) or Google (Chromium). If Firefox collapses:

  • Big Tech’s control over the web grows stronger—exactly what antitrust regulators are trying to prevent.
  • Fewer choices for users—reducing competition in browser innovation and privacy features.
  • Less funding for Mozilla’s nonprofit initiatives, including open-source web tools and AI-driven climate research.

Why Switching to Bing (or Another Search Engine) Isn’t a Viable Solution

Mozilla has explored alternatives, but the reality is grim:

  • Bing doesn’t monetize searches as effectively as Google, meaning lower revenue share for Mozilla.
  • Past experiments with Yahoo as the default led to mass user abandonment.
  • Without Google’s bids, Mozilla would have less leverage in negotiations, further reducing income.

The DOJ’s Dilemma: Fixing Google’s Monopoly Without Killing Competitors

The DOJ’s goal is noble—breaking Google’s stranglehold on search—but the unintended consequences could be catastrophic. If Firefox disappears:

✅ Google Chrome’s dominance grows—fewer competitors mean less incentive for privacy and performance improvements.
✅ Apple’s Safari remains the only alternative, further consolidating power in the hands of tech giants.
✅ Innovation suffers—Firefox has been a pioneer in privacy features like Enhanced Tracking Protection.

Can Mozilla Survive Without Google’s Money?

Muhlheim’s testimony paints a bleak picture:

“We would be really struggling to stay alive… waiting on a hypothetical future where more search competitors emerge.”

The harsh truth? Regulators must act carefully—if they dismantle Google’s monopoly too aggressively, they might inadvertently strengthen it by eliminating its biggest rival.

The Path Forward: Balancing Antitrust Enforcement & Browser Survival

To preserve a diverse, competitive web, regulators should consider:

  1. Phasing out Google’s default deals gradually—giving Mozilla time to adapt.
  2. Mandating revenue-sharing transparency—ensuring fair competition in search monetization.
  3. Supporting independent browsers—through grants or antitrust settlement funds.

Final Thoughts: Why Firefox’s Survival Matters

Firefox is more than just a browser—it’s a guardian of an open, decentralized internet. If it falls, the web becomes a duopoly of Google and Apple, with fewer choices for users and developers.

The DOJ’s case against Google is necessary, but the remedy must protect competitors, not destroy them. Otherwise, the cure could be worse than the disease.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles