Techfullpost

Signal’s latest Windows version stops the system from taking chat screenshots

Signal's latest Windows version stops the system from taking chat screenshots

Signal has rolled out a critical privacy-focused update for its Windows app, introducing a “screen security” setting that prevents the system from capturing screenshots—directly countering Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature.

This move reinforces Signal’s commitment to user privacy, ensuring sensitive conversations remain protected even against AI-powered background surveillance. Here’s everything you need to know.


Why Signal Is Blocking Windows Screenshots

Microsoft Recall: A Privacy Concern

Microsoft’s Recall feature (announced in 2023) continuously captures and stores screenshots of user activity, allowing Windows 11 users to “scroll back in time” and revisit past actions.

Despite Microsoft pausing Recall’s rollout after backlash, the company reintroduced it in April 2024 via the Windows Insider Preview Channel with key changes:
✔ Opt-in requirement (users must enable it manually)
✔ Pause functionality (temporary deactivation)

However, Signal argues that Recall still poses risks:
🔴 Potential exposure of sensitive chats (even if encrypted)
🔴 Lack of granular app-level control (Recall captures everything by default)

How Signal’s “Screen Security” Works

When enabled, this setting:
✅ Blocks Windows from screenshotting Signal’s window (shows a blank screen instead)
✅ Prevents Recall from storing private conversations
✅ Maintains end-to-end encryption integrity

⚠ Trade-off: Some accessibility tools (like screen readers) may not function properly with this setting active.


How to Enable (or Disable) Signal’s Screen Security

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Open Signal Desktop
  2. Go to Settings > Privacy > Screen Security
  3. Toggle “Block screenshots” (enabled by default)

🔹 Disabling the feature requires confirmation (to prevent accidental deactivation).
🔹 A warning appears reminding users of potential privacy risks.


Signal’s Critique of Microsoft’s Approach

In a blog post, Signal expressed frustration with the need for such workarounds:

“We hope that AI teams building systems like Recall will consider these implications more carefully. Apps like Signal shouldn’t need a ‘one weird trick’ to protect user privacy—developers deserve better tools.”

Key Issues with Recall

🔸 No API for apps to opt out (forcing manual workarounds like Signal’s)
🔸 Potential security vulnerabilities (stored screenshots could be accessed by malware)
🔸 Privacy vs. convenience imbalance (users may not fully understand the risks)


What This Means for Windows Users

✔ Signal users gain stronger privacy protection against Recall.
✔ Other encrypted apps (like WhatsApp, Telegram) may follow suit.
✔ Microsoft faces continued scrutiny over AI-powered surveillance features.

Should You Disable Recall Entirely?

If privacy is a priority:

  1. Avoid enabling Recall (if using Windows Insider builds).
  2. Use Signal’s screen security for encrypted chats.
  3. Monitor future Windows updates for improved privacy controls.

Final Verdict: A Necessary Move for Privacy

Signal’s update highlights the growing tension between AI convenience and user privacy. While Microsoft positions Recall as a productivity tool, its always-on screenshotting raises legitimate security concerns.

By proactively blocking Recall, Signal sets a precedent—tech companies must prioritize privacy by design, not as an afterthought.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In a dramatic shift for Android users, the Google Play Store has removed a staggering 1.8 million apps since the start of 2024—47% of its entire catalog—according to new data from Appfigures. This mass exodus reflects Google’s aggressive crackdown on low-quality, spammy, and policy-violating apps, signaling a major shift in how the tech giant manages its digital marketplace.

Key Findings: Why Millions of Apps Got the Boot

  • Games hit hardest (200,000 removed)
  • Education apps saw 160,700 deletions
  • Business apps lost 115,400 listings
  • Total apps dropped from 3.4M to 1.6M
  • Apple’s App Store grew slightly (1.6M to 1.64M apps)

Google’s Stance:
“We’re focused on delivering high-quality apps and continuous improvements for user safety,” says spokesperson Dan Jackson.


Behind the Purge: Google’s War on Bad Apps

1. Stricter Review Policies (2023 Onward)

  • Mandatory 20-person testing for all new apps (2-week minimum)
  • AI-powered scans detecting copycat/spam apps
  • Blocked 2.36M policy-violating apps in 2024 alone

2. Targeting “Low-Value” Apps

Google now removes apps with:

  • Limited functionality (e.g., single-feature calculators)
  • Deceptive subscriptions
  • Fake reviews or engagement farming

3. The “Apple Effect”?

While Google purged apps, Apple’s App Store grew by 40,000—likely due to:
✔ Stricter upfront review process
✔ Higher developer fees ($99/year) acting as a filter
✔ Fewer “throwaway” apps in iOS ecosystem


Who’s Affected? Winners & Losers

Losers:

❌ Clone App Developers – Low-effort duplicates are being wiped out
❌ Ad-Farming Apps – Google’s AI now detects fake engagement
❌ “Fleeceware” Scams – Deceptive subscription traps are being banned

Winners:

✅ Legitimate Developers – Less competition from spam apps
✅ Android Users – Higher-quality, safer app ecosystem
✅ Enterprise Apps – Business/education apps surviving purge indicate higher standards


The Bigger Trend: App Stores Are Growing Up

  • Quality over quantity is now the priority
  • AI moderation replacing manual reviews
  • Developer accountability increasing (testing requirements)

Expert Insight:
“This isn’t just a cleanup—it’s a complete repositioning. Google wants Play Store to rival Apple’s curated experience,” says mobile analyst Sarah Chen.

A political firestorm erupted this week after Punchbowl News—a DC outlet known for political scoops but with little tech reporting experience—published a single-sourced rumor that Amazon was considering displaying tariff costs next to product prices. The unverified claim triggered an immediate and aggressive response from the Trump administration, leading to Amazon’s swift denial—and raising serious questions about corporate independence, media integrity, and the true meaning of “free markets.”

How the Drama Unfolded

  1. Punchbowl News reported (without confirmation) that Amazon might start showing tariffs.
  2. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was questioned about it at a White House briefing.
  3. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt intervened, claiming President Trump called it a “hostile and political act by Amazon.”
  4. Amazon instantly backtracked, with spokesperson Tim Doyle stating the idea was “never approved and is not going to happen.”

Why This Overreaction Matters

  • No Actual Policy Change Occurred – The White House lashed out at a hypothetical scenario, revealing hypersensitivity to even the suggestion of price transparency.
  • Tariffs Are a Political Weak Spot – If Amazon displayed tariffs, consumers would see the direct cost of trade policies, undermining the administration’s economic narrative.
  • Corporate Capitulation – Amazon’s immediate surrender signals how easily even the world’s largest companies bow to political pressure.

Jeff Bezos’ Hypocrisy Problem

The real story here isn’t tariffs—it’s Jeff Bezos’ credibility. The Amazon founder has spent years positioning himself as a free-market champion, even restructuring The Washington Post around “two pillars“:

“Personal liberties and free markets […] Freedom is ethical—it minimizes coercion—and practical—it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.” – Jeff Bezos, 2023

Yet when faced with government intimidation over a mere pricing idea, Amazon folded instantly.

Bezos’ Contradictions

✔ Claims his wealth shields The Post from coercion – Yet Amazon caves to White House pressure.
✔ Preaches free markets – But allows political threats to dictate business decisions.
✔ Promises editorial independence – While The Post’s credibility erodes under his leadership.

If Bezos truly believes in free markets, he must:

  • Stand up to political bullying and implement transparent pricing.
  • Allow The Washington Post to critique trade policies without fear.
  • Prove his principles outweigh shareholder appeasement.

Otherwise, his rhetoric is just empty posturing.

The Bigger Picture: Corporate Power vs. Political Pressure

This incident highlights a disturbing trend:

🔴 Governments strong-arming businesses into compliance.
🔴 Tech giants prioritizing survival over principles.
🔴 Media credibility suffering under billionaire ownership.

What Should Happen Next?

  • Amazon should call the White House’s bluff and display tariffs anyway.
  • The Washington Post should investigate the administration’s trade policies aggressively.
  • Consumers and investors should demand consistency from corporate leaders.

Final Verdict: A Defining Moment for Bezos

Jeff Bezos now faces a leadership test. Will he:

✅ Defend free markets by resisting political intimidation?
❌ Or prove his principles are negotiable when power is at stake?

His next move will reveal whether he’s a true advocate for economic freedom—or just another billionaire playing both sides.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles