Techfullnews

The Dodge Charger GT: A V6 Muscle Car That Sparks Debate

dodge charger/techfullnews

The Dodge Charger has long been synonymous with raw power, roaring V8 engines, and the unmistakable aura of American muscle. However, the Charger GT trim has stirred up controversy among enthusiasts and critics alike. Why? Because it’s powered exclusively by a V6 engine—a decision that has left many wondering if it truly lives up to the Charger legacy. In this article, we’ll dive into the details of the Charger GT, explore why Dodge chose a V6 for this model, and examine whether it still holds its own in the competitive world of muscle cars.


The Heart of the Controversy: A V6 in a Muscle Car

The Dodge Charger GT is equipped with a 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 engine, a powertrain that has been a staple in Dodge’s lineup for years. This engine delivers 300 horsepower and 264 lb-ft of torque, paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. On paper, these numbers are respectable, offering a fuel economy of up to 30 mpg on the highway—a significant advantage over its V8 counterparts.

However, the Charger GT’s V6 engine has drawn criticism from both car enthusiasts and automotive experts. Publications like Autotrader and Car and Driver have noted that while the V6 provides adequate performance, it lacks the thrilling, visceral experience expected from a Charger. Edmunds went so far as to describe the driving experience as “surprisingly flat,” emphasizing that the GT doesn’t quite capture the high-performance spirit of its V8 siblings.

The core issue isn’t that the V6 is a bad engine—it’s that Dodge chose to put it in a Charger, a car with a storied history of V8 dominance. For many, the Charger GT feels like a compromise, offering practicality at the expense of the raw power that defines the muscle car experience.


Why Did Dodge Choose a V6 for the Charger GT?

Dodge’s decision to equip the Charger GT with a V6 engine wasn’t made lightly. Several factors likely influenced this choice:

  1. Positioning in the Lineup
    The Charger GT is positioned as a mid-tier option, sitting between the base SXT trim and the more performance-oriented R/T and Scat Pack models. By offering only a V6, Dodge created a clear distinction between these trims, ensuring that buyers looking for V8 power would need to step up to the higher-end models.
  2. Fuel Efficiency and Regulations
    With increasing pressure to meet stricter fuel economy standards, Dodge likely saw the V6 as a way to balance performance with better mpg ratings. This makes the Charger GT more appealing to a broader audience, including those who prioritize efficiency over outright power.
  3. All-Wheel Drive Capability
    One unique advantage of the Charger GT is its available all-wheel drive (AWD) system—a feature not offered in V8 models. This makes the GT a practical choice for drivers in colder climates or those who value enhanced traction and handling in adverse weather conditions.
  4. Cost and Accessibility
    By sticking with a V6, Dodge was able to keep the Charger GT’s price point more accessible, appealing to buyers who want a taste of the Charger experience without the higher costs associated with V8 engines.

How Does the Charger GT Compare to V8 Models?

For those who crave the unmistakable power of a V8, Dodge offers several alternatives within the Charger lineup:

  • Dodge Charger R/T
    The R/T trim features a 5.7-liter HEMI V8 engine, delivering 370 horsepower and 395 lb-ft of torque. With rear-wheel drive (RWD) as standard, the R/T offers a significant performance boost over the GT, making it a favorite among drivers who want a true muscle car experience.
  • Dodge Charger Scat Pack
    The Scat Pack takes things up a notch with a 6.4-liter HEMI V8, producing 485 horsepower and 475 lb-ft of torque. This trim is designed for enthusiasts who want high-performance thrills without stepping into the supercharged territory of the Hellcat models.

While these V8-powered Chargers deliver the raw power and excitement that muscle car fans crave, they come with trade-offs, including lower fuel efficiency, higher maintenance costs, and the lack of AWD capability.


The Case for the Charger GT’s V6 Engine

Despite the criticism, the Charger GT’s V6 engine has its merits. Here’s why it might still be the right choice for some buyers:

  1. Fuel Efficiency
    With a highway fuel economy of up to 30 mpg, the Charger GT is significantly more efficient than its V8 counterparts, making it a practical option for daily driving.
  2. All-Wheel Drive Option
    The availability of AWD sets the Charger GT apart from V8 models, offering better traction and handling in snow, rain, or other challenging conditions.
  3. Lower Cost of Ownership
    The V6 engine is not only more affordable upfront but also cheaper to maintain and insure compared to a V8. This makes the Charger GT an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
  4. Balanced Performance
    While it may not deliver the same adrenaline rush as a V8, the Charger GT’s V6 still offers plenty of power for everyday driving, with enough muscle to make it fun on the open road.

Is the Charger GT a True Muscle Car?

The answer to this question depends on your definition of a muscle car. If you believe a muscle car must have a V8 engine and rear-wheel drive, then the Charger GT falls short. However, if you view a muscle car as a vehicle that combines performance, style, and practicality, the Charger GT holds its own.

The Charger GT may not satisfy purists, but it offers a compelling blend of features that make it a strong contender in its segment. It’s a car designed for those who want the Charger experience without the compromises that come with a V8.


Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy the Charger GT?

The Dodge Charger GT is a car that sparks debate, and for good reason. It represents a departure from the traditional muscle car formula, prioritizing practicality and accessibility over raw power. While it may not win over die-hard enthusiasts, it’s an excellent choice for buyers who value:

  • Fuel efficiency for daily commuting.
  • All-wheel drive for year-round versatility.
  • Affordability in both purchase price and maintenance.

For those who insist on V8 power, stepping up to the R/T or Scat Pack is the way to go. But for everyone else, the Charger GT offers a unique blend of performance, style, and practicality that makes it a standout option in the Charger lineup.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In late 2023, The Wall Street Journal dropped a bombshell report claiming Tesla’s board had quietly initiated a search for Elon Musk’s successor as CEO. According to anonymous sources familiar with the matter:

  • The board allegedly began the process approximately one month before the report
  • Multiple executive search firms were contacted, with one firm reportedly selected to lead the process
  • Directors supposedly urged Musk to publicly commit more time to Tesla

The timing is critical. This alleged search coincided with:

  • Tesla’s first year-over-year delivery decline since 2020 (8.5% drop in Q1 2024)
  • A 13% decline in annual revenue – the first since 2017
  • Musk’s increasingly polarizing political engagements

Tesla’s Furious Rebuttal and the Credibility Battle

Within hours of publication, Tesla launched an aggressive counterattack:

1. Official Statement from Chair Robyn Denholm:

  • Called the report “absolutely false”
  • Claimed the board remains “highly confident” in Musk’s leadership
  • Alleged the WSJ was informed of this before publication

2. Musk’s Personal Response:

  • Accused WSJ of “EXTREMELY BAD BREACH OF ETHICS”
  • Claimed the paper ignored Tesla’s “unequivocal denial”

Journalistic Standoff:
The WSJ maintains it:

  • Reached out to Musk for comment (received no response)
  • Never received any pre-publication statement from Tesla

This credibility battle raises serious questions about:

  • The independence of Tesla’s board
  • The reliability of anonymous sourcing
  • Musk’s increasingly adversarial relationship with mainstream media

Deep Dive: Tesla’s Board Composition and Governance Concerns

Tesla’s eight-member board has long faced criticism for its close ties to Musk:

Notable Members:

  1. Kimbal Musk (Elon’s brother)
  2. James Murdoch (son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch)
  3. Ira Ehrenpreis (venture capitalist, Tesla director since 2007)
  4. Robyn Denholm (Chair since 2018)

Governance Red Flags:

  • Lack of Independence: 5 of 8 directors have served over 10 years
  • Compensation Controversy: Approved Musk’s $56B pay package (later voided by court)
  • Recent Insider Selling: Denholm sold $50M+ in shares over 90 days

Expert Perspective:
“Tesla’s board fails nearly every test of good corporate governance,” says Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. “The level of entrenchment and lack of independent oversight is unprecedented for a company of this size.”

The Five Critical Challenges Facing Tesla’s Leadership

1. The “Key Person” Risk

Musk isn’t just CEO – he’s Tesla’s:

  • Chief product architect
  • Primary technology visionary
  • Main public spokesperson

Succession Planning Reality:

  • Apple began grooming Tim Cook years before Steve Jobs’ passing
  • Microsoft had Satya Nadella in leadership pipeline before Ballmer’s exit
  • Tesla has no publicly identified successor

2. Musk’s Divided Attention

The billionaire currently oversees:

  • SpaceX (CEO)
  • Neuralink (Founder)
  • The Boring Company (Founder)
  • xAI (Founder)
  • X/Twitter (Owner)

Time Allocation Impact:

  • 2023 analysis shows Musk spent <40% time at Tesla
  • Critical product launches (Cybertruck, Roadster) repeatedly delayed

3. Brand Erosion and Political Polarization

Musk’s recent activities:

  • Endorsed conservative political candidates
  • Acquired Twitter and reinstated banned accounts
  • Made controversial statements on gender, COVID, and other hot-button issues

Consumer Impact:

  • 2023 survey showed 18% drop in brand favorability among Democrats
  • 7% increase among Republicans (showing increasing politicization)

4. Operational Challenges

Production Issues:

  • Cybertruck production at 25% of targets
  • Model 3 Highland refresh delayed in North America

Financial Pressures:

  • Operating margins fell from 19% (2021) to 8% (2023)
  • $18B debt load with rising interest expenses

5. Technological Crossroads

Autonomy Delays:

  • Full Self-Driving (FSD) still at Level 2 after 10+ years
  • Major competitors (Waymo, Cruise) deploying robotaxis

Battery Innovation:

  • 4680 cells not meeting energy density targets
  • Chinese competitors achieving faster charging speeds

Potential Succession Scenarios and Implications

Internal Candidates Analysis

1. Drew Baglino (Former SVP Powertrain & Energy)

  • Strengths: Deep technical expertise, 18-year Tesla veteran
  • Weaknesses: Limited public-facing experience, resigned April 2024

2. Tom Zhu (SVP Automotive)

  • Strengths: Turned around China operations, production expert
  • Weaknesses: Limited autonomy/AI experience

3. Lars Moravy (VP Vehicle Engineering)

  • Strengths: Product development leader, respected internally
  • Weaknesses: Unknown strategic vision

External Possibilities

Wildcard Option:
Could Tesla recruit an auto industry veteran like:

  • Jim Farley (Ford CEO)
  • Herbert Diess (Former VW CEO)

Tech Industry Options:

  • Jennifer Tejada (Former PagerDuty CEO)
  • Gwynne Shotwell (SpaceX COO)

Investor Perspectives: What the Street Is Saying

Bull Case:

  • “Musk is irreplaceable as a tech visionary” – Dan Ives, Wedbush
  • “Succession planning doesn’t equal imminent change” – Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley

Bear Case:

  • “The board has failed shareholders by not planning sooner” – GLJ Research
  • “Tesla needs an operational CEO to complement Musk’s vision” – Bernstein

Institutional Investor Sentiment:

  • Vanguard and BlackRock both supported shareholder proposals for better succession planning
  • 32% of votes favored independent chair proposal in 2023 (up from 26% in 2022)

Historical Precedents: Lessons From Tech Leadership Transitions

Successful Transitions:

  1. Microsoft (Ballmer → Nadella)
    • Key: Clear succession pipeline
    • Result: $500B+ value creation
  2. Apple (Jobs → Cook)
    • Key: Multi-year transition period
    • Result: Maintained innovation while scaling

Failed Transitions:

  1. Uber (Kalanick → Khosrowshahi)
    • Issue: Crisis-driven change
    • Result: Years of instability
  2. WeWork (Neumann → SoftBank takeover)
    • Issue: No planning
    • Result: Near-collapse

The Path Forward: Strategic Recommendations

For Tesla’s Board

  1. Formalize Succession Plan
    • Identify 2-3 internal candidates
    • Establish mentorship program
  2. Enhance Governance
    • Add independent directors
    • Separate Chair/CEO roles
  3. Manage Transparent Communication
    • Public roadmap for leadership development
    • Clear timelines for any transitions

For Investors

  1. Monitor These Key Metrics:
    • Musk’s time allocation (via jet tracking, public appearances)
    • Board refreshment (any new independent appointments)
    • Succession-related disclosures in next proxy statement
  2. Engagement Priorities:
    • Push for formal succession committee
    • Advocate for board independence

Conclusion: Why This Matters Beyond Tesla

The Tesla leadership saga represents a case study in:

  • Founder-led company challenges
  • Board governance in disruptive tech
  • Investor rights in high-growth firms

As Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood recently noted: “The market isn’t pricing in the key person risk at Tesla. When that changes, it could be dramatic.”

The coming months will prove crucial. Will Tesla:

  • Double down on Musk’s leadership?
  • Begin a gradual transition?
  • Face a crisis-driven change?

One thing is certain: How Tesla navigates this challenge will shape not just its future, but the broader conversation about leadership in transformative companies.

Last night, an audacious new automaker named Slate Auto unveiled its first vehicle—a minimalist, no-frills electric truck designed to combat America’s obsession with oversized, overpowered vehicles. With a target price under $20,000 (after incentives), 150 miles of range, and stripped-back design, the Slate Truck is a bold experiment in right-sizing personal transportation.

But will it succeed in a market dominated by monster trucks and SUVs?


Why America’s Obsession With Bigger Trucks Is a Problem

1. The Rise of the “Land Yacht”

  • In 2024, trucks and SUVs made up 75% of new vehicle sales—up from just 50% a decade ago.
  • The average new car now weighs over 5,000 lbs (2.27 tons), with EVs like the Ford F-150 Lightning pushing 6,500 lbs.
  • Bigger vehicles = deadlier roads:
    • Pedestrian deaths surged 57% from 2013–2022 (NHTSA).
    • Trucks with tall hoods (40+ inches) are 44% more lethal (IIHS).

2. The “Compact Truck” Is Nearly Extinct

  • Ford Maverick (2024):
    • 199.7 inches long, 83.5 inches wide
    • Considered “small” by today’s standards
  • Slate Truck:
    • 174.6 inches long, 70.6 inches wide
    • Closer in size to a classic 1985 Toyota pickup

“Our roads are packed with roving land yachts. The Slate Truck is a throwback to when vehicles were sized for humans, not egos.”


Slate Truck: What You Get (And What You Don’t)

✅ The Good: Simple, Affordable, Functional

✔ **20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(49,740).
✔ No Bloatware – No touchscreen, no stereo, no paint (keeps costs down).
✔ Smartphone-Centric – Uses a phone/tablet mount + basic gauge cluster.
✔ Practical Hauling – 1,433 lbs payload, 1,000 lbs towing (enough for most users).

❌ The Trade-Offs

  • 150-Mile Range – Fine for city use, but not for road trips.
  • No Luxury Features – If you want Apple CarPlay or a premium sound system, look elsewhere.
  • Aftermarket Customization Required – Want paint? A stereo? You’ll have to DIY.

Could This Be the Start of a “Small Truck” Revival?

Why the Timing Might Be Right

  • EV Incentives – Federal tax credits could keep prices under $20K.
  • Younger Buyers – Gen Z and Millennials prefer affordability over status symbols.
  • Urban Living – Smaller trucks are easier to park in cities.

The Biggest Challenges

⚠ Consumer Psychology – Will buyers reject a “cheap” truck in a premium-obsessed market?
⚠ Political Risk – A Trump win could kill EV tax credits, raising the price.
⚠ Production Realities – Most EV startups fail. Can Slate deliver by 2026?


Verdict: A Long Shot, But a Necessary One

The Slate Truck isn’t for everyone—but it doesn’t need to be. If even 5% of truck buyers opt for a smaller, cheaper, more efficient alternative, it could shift the auto industry’s trajectory.

Final Question:

Would you drive a $20K electric truck with no frills?

  • Yes, if it saves money!
  • No, I need more power/luxury.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles