Techfullnews

Evel Knievel: The Legendary Daredevil and His Iconic Motorcycles

Evel Knievel/techfullnews

Few figures in history have captured the world’s imagination quite like Evel Knievel. A true pioneer of extreme sports, Knievel’s death-defying motorcycle stunts made him a global icon in the 1960s and 1970s. His career spanned decades, during which he attempted over 300 jumps on motorcycles from legendary brands like Honda, Triumph, Laverda, and Harley-Davidson. But what made Evel Knievel truly remarkable wasn’t just his bravery—it was his ability to push the boundaries of what was thought possible, often with little more than sheer determination and a hastily sketched plan.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into Evel Knievel’s most iconic stunts and the motorcycles that made them possible. We’ll also explore the engineering behind these bikes, the risks Knievel faced, and the legacy he left behind. Whether you’re a motorcycle enthusiast, a history buff, or simply someone who appreciates stories of human courage, this is a tale you won’t want to miss.


The Caesar’s Palace Jump: A Turning Point in Evel Knievel’s Career

One of Knievel’s most famous—and disastrous—stunts took place in 1967 at Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas. Thousands of spectators gathered to watch him attempt to jump the casino’s fountain, a feat that required him to soar over 140 feet through the air.

What many don’t know is that this stunt was far from a calculated endeavor. According to John Derek, who was filming a documentary at the time, Knievel himself doubted he could successfully complete the jump. The planning was rudimentary, with calculations scrawled on the back of napkins rather than sophisticated simulations. Despite his reservations, Knievel went ahead with the jump, a decision that would change his life forever.

The landing went horribly wrong, resulting in a horrific crash that left Knievel with multiple broken bones and a month-long coma. Yet, true to his indomitable spirit, he survived and continued to perform even more daring stunts. This event not only cemented his reputation as a daredevil but also highlighted the incredible risks he took to entertain and inspire.


The Motorcycles Behind the Legend

Evel Knievel’s stunts wouldn’t have been possible without the motorcycles he rode. Each bike was chosen for its unique capabilities, and many were modified to withstand the extreme demands of his jumps. Let’s take a closer look at some of the most iconic motorcycles in Knievel’s arsenal.

1. Honda CL 305 Scrambler

The Honda CL 305 Scrambler was one of Knievel’s earliest stunt bikes. Introduced in 1965, this versatile motorcycle featured a 305cc engine and was designed for both on- and off-road use. Its robust suspension system and lightweight frame (weighing just 337 pounds) made it an ideal choice for stunts.

Knievel used the CL 305 Scrambler to perform promotional jumps for his Honda dealership, including leaps over dangerous animals like mountain lions and rattlesnakes. The bike’s higher exhaust pipes provided superior ground clearance, while its durable frame ensured it could handle the punishment of repeated jumps.

2. Triumph T120 TT Special 650cc

The Triumph T120 TT Special was a racing bike exclusive to the U.S. market. With a 650cc engine producing 52 horsepower and a top speed of 120 mph, this bike was a powerhouse. Knievel used it for wheelies and crowd-pleasing tricks, often warming up audiences before his main stunts.

Interestingly, Knievel had grand plans for the T120 TT Special, including a modified version he called the “Skycycle.” He intended to use it to jump the Grand Canyon, but the National Park Service denied his request. Undeterred, he relocated the stunt to Snake River Canyon, further solidifying his reputation as a fearless innovator.

3. Laverda American Eagle S Model 750cc

In the late 1960s, Italian manufacturer Laverda sought to break into the U.S. market with the American Eagle S Model. This bike featured a 750cc twin-cylinder engine and was praised for its balance of power and maneuverability.

Knievel was commissioned to promote the brand and used the American Eagle for over a dozen stunts. However, the bike’s weight—nearly 690 pounds when fully loaded—made it a risky choice for jumps. Of the 13 stunts Knievel attempted with this bike, six ended in crashes, highlighting the dangers he faced with every leap.

4. Harley-Davidson XR-750

The Harley-Davidson XR-750 is perhaps the most iconic motorcycle associated with Evel Knievel. Known for its lightweight design and powerful 750cc engine, this bike became Knievel’s go-to choice for record-breaking stunts.

Knievel set a world record by jumping over 19 vehicles on a modified XR-750, which featured his signature red, white, and blue paint scheme. Despite its success, the XR-750 was also involved in one of Knievel’s most infamous crashes—a failed attempt to clear 13 double-decker buses at Wembley Stadium. Today, one of Knievel’s XR-750s is on display at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum, a testament to its place in history.

5. Triumph Bonneville T140 750cc

The Triumph Bonneville T140 was a stylish and ergonomic bike that marked the end of Knievel’s career. With a 744cc engine and lightweight design, it was a favorite among classic motorcycle enthusiasts.

By the late 1970s, Knievel had retired from performing major stunts due to the toll his injuries had taken on his body. However, he continued to ride the Bonneville T140 at events, thrilling crowds with his signature wheelies.


The Legacy of Evel Knievel

Evel Knievel’s career was defined by his willingness to take risks and push the limits of human potential. His stunts were not just about entertainment—they were a testament to the power of perseverance and the human spirit.

Today, Knievel’s legacy lives on in the motorcycles he rode, the records he set, and the countless fans he inspired. His story serves as a reminder that greatness often requires stepping into the unknown, even when the odds are stacked against you.


Why Evel Knievel’s Story Matters Today

In an age dominated by technology and virtual experiences, Evel Knievel’s story reminds us of the value of real-world courage and determination. His stunts were a blend of artistry, engineering, and sheer willpower, making him a true pioneer in every sense of the word.

For motorcycle enthusiasts, Knievel’s bikes offer a fascinating glimpse into the evolution of motorcycle design and performance. For everyone else, his life is a powerful example of what can be achieved when we dare to dream big and refuse to back down.


Final Thoughts

Evel Knievel was more than just a stuntman—he was a cultural icon who redefined what it meant to be a daredevil. His motorcycles were not just tools of his trade; they were extensions of his personality, each one playing a crucial role in his journey.

As we look back on his life and career, we’re reminded of the importance of taking risks, embracing challenges, and never giving up—no matter how daunting the obstacles may seem. Evel Knievel’s story is one of triumph, resilience, and the enduring power of the human spirit.

If you’re inspired by Evel Knievel’s legacy, why not explore the world of classic motorcycles or even take up a new challenge of your own? After all, as Knievel himself once said, “Anybody can jump a motorcycle. The trouble begins when you try to land it.”

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In late 2023, The Wall Street Journal dropped a bombshell report claiming Tesla’s board had quietly initiated a search for Elon Musk’s successor as CEO. According to anonymous sources familiar with the matter:

  • The board allegedly began the process approximately one month before the report
  • Multiple executive search firms were contacted, with one firm reportedly selected to lead the process
  • Directors supposedly urged Musk to publicly commit more time to Tesla

The timing is critical. This alleged search coincided with:

  • Tesla’s first year-over-year delivery decline since 2020 (8.5% drop in Q1 2024)
  • A 13% decline in annual revenue – the first since 2017
  • Musk’s increasingly polarizing political engagements

Tesla’s Furious Rebuttal and the Credibility Battle

Within hours of publication, Tesla launched an aggressive counterattack:

1. Official Statement from Chair Robyn Denholm:

  • Called the report “absolutely false”
  • Claimed the board remains “highly confident” in Musk’s leadership
  • Alleged the WSJ was informed of this before publication

2. Musk’s Personal Response:

  • Accused WSJ of “EXTREMELY BAD BREACH OF ETHICS”
  • Claimed the paper ignored Tesla’s “unequivocal denial”

Journalistic Standoff:
The WSJ maintains it:

  • Reached out to Musk for comment (received no response)
  • Never received any pre-publication statement from Tesla

This credibility battle raises serious questions about:

  • The independence of Tesla’s board
  • The reliability of anonymous sourcing
  • Musk’s increasingly adversarial relationship with mainstream media

Deep Dive: Tesla’s Board Composition and Governance Concerns

Tesla’s eight-member board has long faced criticism for its close ties to Musk:

Notable Members:

  1. Kimbal Musk (Elon’s brother)
  2. James Murdoch (son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch)
  3. Ira Ehrenpreis (venture capitalist, Tesla director since 2007)
  4. Robyn Denholm (Chair since 2018)

Governance Red Flags:

  • Lack of Independence: 5 of 8 directors have served over 10 years
  • Compensation Controversy: Approved Musk’s $56B pay package (later voided by court)
  • Recent Insider Selling: Denholm sold $50M+ in shares over 90 days

Expert Perspective:
“Tesla’s board fails nearly every test of good corporate governance,” says Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. “The level of entrenchment and lack of independent oversight is unprecedented for a company of this size.”

The Five Critical Challenges Facing Tesla’s Leadership

1. The “Key Person” Risk

Musk isn’t just CEO – he’s Tesla’s:

  • Chief product architect
  • Primary technology visionary
  • Main public spokesperson

Succession Planning Reality:

  • Apple began grooming Tim Cook years before Steve Jobs’ passing
  • Microsoft had Satya Nadella in leadership pipeline before Ballmer’s exit
  • Tesla has no publicly identified successor

2. Musk’s Divided Attention

The billionaire currently oversees:

  • SpaceX (CEO)
  • Neuralink (Founder)
  • The Boring Company (Founder)
  • xAI (Founder)
  • X/Twitter (Owner)

Time Allocation Impact:

  • 2023 analysis shows Musk spent <40% time at Tesla
  • Critical product launches (Cybertruck, Roadster) repeatedly delayed

3. Brand Erosion and Political Polarization

Musk’s recent activities:

  • Endorsed conservative political candidates
  • Acquired Twitter and reinstated banned accounts
  • Made controversial statements on gender, COVID, and other hot-button issues

Consumer Impact:

  • 2023 survey showed 18% drop in brand favorability among Democrats
  • 7% increase among Republicans (showing increasing politicization)

4. Operational Challenges

Production Issues:

  • Cybertruck production at 25% of targets
  • Model 3 Highland refresh delayed in North America

Financial Pressures:

  • Operating margins fell from 19% (2021) to 8% (2023)
  • $18B debt load with rising interest expenses

5. Technological Crossroads

Autonomy Delays:

  • Full Self-Driving (FSD) still at Level 2 after 10+ years
  • Major competitors (Waymo, Cruise) deploying robotaxis

Battery Innovation:

  • 4680 cells not meeting energy density targets
  • Chinese competitors achieving faster charging speeds

Potential Succession Scenarios and Implications

Internal Candidates Analysis

1. Drew Baglino (Former SVP Powertrain & Energy)

  • Strengths: Deep technical expertise, 18-year Tesla veteran
  • Weaknesses: Limited public-facing experience, resigned April 2024

2. Tom Zhu (SVP Automotive)

  • Strengths: Turned around China operations, production expert
  • Weaknesses: Limited autonomy/AI experience

3. Lars Moravy (VP Vehicle Engineering)

  • Strengths: Product development leader, respected internally
  • Weaknesses: Unknown strategic vision

External Possibilities

Wildcard Option:
Could Tesla recruit an auto industry veteran like:

  • Jim Farley (Ford CEO)
  • Herbert Diess (Former VW CEO)

Tech Industry Options:

  • Jennifer Tejada (Former PagerDuty CEO)
  • Gwynne Shotwell (SpaceX COO)

Investor Perspectives: What the Street Is Saying

Bull Case:

  • “Musk is irreplaceable as a tech visionary” – Dan Ives, Wedbush
  • “Succession planning doesn’t equal imminent change” – Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley

Bear Case:

  • “The board has failed shareholders by not planning sooner” – GLJ Research
  • “Tesla needs an operational CEO to complement Musk’s vision” – Bernstein

Institutional Investor Sentiment:

  • Vanguard and BlackRock both supported shareholder proposals for better succession planning
  • 32% of votes favored independent chair proposal in 2023 (up from 26% in 2022)

Historical Precedents: Lessons From Tech Leadership Transitions

Successful Transitions:

  1. Microsoft (Ballmer → Nadella)
    • Key: Clear succession pipeline
    • Result: $500B+ value creation
  2. Apple (Jobs → Cook)
    • Key: Multi-year transition period
    • Result: Maintained innovation while scaling

Failed Transitions:

  1. Uber (Kalanick → Khosrowshahi)
    • Issue: Crisis-driven change
    • Result: Years of instability
  2. WeWork (Neumann → SoftBank takeover)
    • Issue: No planning
    • Result: Near-collapse

The Path Forward: Strategic Recommendations

For Tesla’s Board

  1. Formalize Succession Plan
    • Identify 2-3 internal candidates
    • Establish mentorship program
  2. Enhance Governance
    • Add independent directors
    • Separate Chair/CEO roles
  3. Manage Transparent Communication
    • Public roadmap for leadership development
    • Clear timelines for any transitions

For Investors

  1. Monitor These Key Metrics:
    • Musk’s time allocation (via jet tracking, public appearances)
    • Board refreshment (any new independent appointments)
    • Succession-related disclosures in next proxy statement
  2. Engagement Priorities:
    • Push for formal succession committee
    • Advocate for board independence

Conclusion: Why This Matters Beyond Tesla

The Tesla leadership saga represents a case study in:

  • Founder-led company challenges
  • Board governance in disruptive tech
  • Investor rights in high-growth firms

As Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood recently noted: “The market isn’t pricing in the key person risk at Tesla. When that changes, it could be dramatic.”

The coming months will prove crucial. Will Tesla:

  • Double down on Musk’s leadership?
  • Begin a gradual transition?
  • Face a crisis-driven change?

One thing is certain: How Tesla navigates this challenge will shape not just its future, but the broader conversation about leadership in transformative companies.

Last night, an audacious new automaker named Slate Auto unveiled its first vehicle—a minimalist, no-frills electric truck designed to combat America’s obsession with oversized, overpowered vehicles. With a target price under $20,000 (after incentives), 150 miles of range, and stripped-back design, the Slate Truck is a bold experiment in right-sizing personal transportation.

But will it succeed in a market dominated by monster trucks and SUVs?


Why America’s Obsession With Bigger Trucks Is a Problem

1. The Rise of the “Land Yacht”

  • In 2024, trucks and SUVs made up 75% of new vehicle sales—up from just 50% a decade ago.
  • The average new car now weighs over 5,000 lbs (2.27 tons), with EVs like the Ford F-150 Lightning pushing 6,500 lbs.
  • Bigger vehicles = deadlier roads:
    • Pedestrian deaths surged 57% from 2013–2022 (NHTSA).
    • Trucks with tall hoods (40+ inches) are 44% more lethal (IIHS).

2. The “Compact Truck” Is Nearly Extinct

  • Ford Maverick (2024):
    • 199.7 inches long, 83.5 inches wide
    • Considered “small” by today’s standards
  • Slate Truck:
    • 174.6 inches long, 70.6 inches wide
    • Closer in size to a classic 1985 Toyota pickup

“Our roads are packed with roving land yachts. The Slate Truck is a throwback to when vehicles were sized for humans, not egos.”


Slate Truck: What You Get (And What You Don’t)

✅ The Good: Simple, Affordable, Functional

✔ **20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(20KPriceTag∗∗–Halfthecostofanaveragenewcar(49,740).
✔ No Bloatware – No touchscreen, no stereo, no paint (keeps costs down).
✔ Smartphone-Centric – Uses a phone/tablet mount + basic gauge cluster.
✔ Practical Hauling – 1,433 lbs payload, 1,000 lbs towing (enough for most users).

❌ The Trade-Offs

  • 150-Mile Range – Fine for city use, but not for road trips.
  • No Luxury Features – If you want Apple CarPlay or a premium sound system, look elsewhere.
  • Aftermarket Customization Required – Want paint? A stereo? You’ll have to DIY.

Could This Be the Start of a “Small Truck” Revival?

Why the Timing Might Be Right

  • EV Incentives – Federal tax credits could keep prices under $20K.
  • Younger Buyers – Gen Z and Millennials prefer affordability over status symbols.
  • Urban Living – Smaller trucks are easier to park in cities.

The Biggest Challenges

⚠ Consumer Psychology – Will buyers reject a “cheap” truck in a premium-obsessed market?
⚠ Political Risk – A Trump win could kill EV tax credits, raising the price.
⚠ Production Realities – Most EV startups fail. Can Slate deliver by 2026?


Verdict: A Long Shot, But a Necessary One

The Slate Truck isn’t for everyone—but it doesn’t need to be. If even 5% of truck buyers opt for a smaller, cheaper, more efficient alternative, it could shift the auto industry’s trajectory.

Final Question:

Would you drive a $20K electric truck with no frills?

  • Yes, if it saves money!
  • No, I need more power/luxury.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles