Techfullnews

TikTok Denies Reports of Potential US Sale to Elon Musk

tiktok/techfullnews

TikTok has categorically denied reports suggesting that its U.S. operations might be sold to billionaire Elon Musk.

This statement came in response to a Bloomberg report claiming that Chinese officials were considering selling TikTok’s U.S. business to Musk if their efforts to overturn an impending ban in the Supreme Court failed.

“We can’t be expected to comment on pure fiction,” a TikTok spokesperson told Variety.

TikTok’s Legal Battle Over U.S. Ban

The platform is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on whether the ban violates the First Amendment. On January 10, justices heard arguments, with initial indications suggesting they might uphold the ban. The restriction is set to take effect on January 19.

The ban stems from legislation signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, allowing the government to block foreign-owned apps viewed as potential threats to national security. TikTok faces a January 19 deadline to divest its U.S. operations or risk removal from app stores across the country. Instead of complying, TikTok has chosen to challenge the law in court.

Reports of Contingency Plans

According to Bloomberg, Chinese officials are reportedly exploring alternative options, including the possibility of selling TikTok’s U.S. branch. One scenario mentioned involves Musk’s company, X (formerly Twitter), taking over TikTok’s U.S. operations in collaboration with ByteDance, the app’s Chinese parent company.

This speculation has drawn attention due to Musk’s perceived alignment with President-elect Donald Trump. Trump recently requested the Supreme Court delay the ban, stating his intention to address the issue diplomatically after taking office.

Broader Context and Implications

The situation highlights the ongoing tension between the U.S. and China over issues such as data security and technological influence. While TikTok has consistently denied accusations of data misuse or ties to the Chinese government, the app has become a flashpoint in broader geopolitical conflicts.

A potential sale to Musk could significantly reshape TikTok’s U.S. operations, aligning them with the vision of an entrepreneur already transforming social media under his leadership. However, TikTok’s outright dismissal of such claims indicates its commitment to maintaining its independence and fighting the ban through legal channels.

As the Supreme Court decision looms, the future of TikTok in the U.S. hangs in the balance, with far-reaching implications for its American user base and the global tech ecosystem.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In a strategic shift, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed plans for a premium subscription tier for Meta AI, positioning it to compete directly with OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus, Google’s Gemini Advanced, and Microsoft’s Copilot Pro. The announcement came during Meta’s Q1 2025 earnings call, signaling a major push to monetize its rapidly growing AI platform.

With nearly 1 billion users already engaging with Meta AI across Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, and its new standalone app, this move could reshape the AI subscription wars. But will users pay for yet another premium chatbot?


Why Is Meta Introducing a Paid AI Tier?

Zuckerberg framed the decision as a natural evolution:

“There’s an opportunity to offer a premium service for people who want to unlock more compute or additional functionality.”

This suggests Meta AI’s paid version could include:
✔ Faster, more powerful AI responses (similar to GPT-4 Turbo in ChatGPT Plus)
✔ Advanced image generation (beyond current free capabilities)
✔ Early access to new AI features (like multi-modal AI or coding assistance)
✔ Ad-free or priority support

Meta’s AI Expansion: A $72 Billion Bet

Meta’s AI ambitions are skyrocketing, with key developments:

  • New Standalone Meta AI App – Launched this week, allowing direct chatbot interaction and image generation.
  • Massive Investment Increase – AI spending projections jumped from 65Bto65Bto72B, outpacing rivals.
  • Ads & Product Recommendations Coming – Zuckerberg hinted at AI-powered shopping integrations, similar to Google’s SGE.

But here’s the catch: Meta won’t rush monetization. Zuckerberg emphasized:

“We’ll be focused on scaling and deepening engagement for at least the next year before building out the business.”

This means the paid tier may not launch until 2026, giving Meta time to refine its AI before charging users.


How Does Meta AI Compare to Paid Rivals?

FeatureMeta AI (Free)Meta AI (Paid?)ChatGPT PlusGemini Advanced
Speed/PerformanceStandardLikely fasterGPT-4 TurboGemini Ultra
Image GenerationYes (basic)Advanced?DALL·E 3Imagen 2
Multi-Modal AILimitedPossible upgradeYes (voice/vision)Yes (Gemini 1.5)
PriceFreeTBA (Est. 10−10−20/mo)$20/month$19.99/month

Key Question: Will Meta undercut competitors on pricing, or match them with superior features?


The Bigger Picture: Meta’s AI Monetization Strategy

  1. Freemium Model Works – Like OpenAI, Meta will likely keep a free tier to retain mass adoption.
  2. Ads Are Coming – AI-generated product recommendations could boost Meta’s ad revenue (already at $42B last quarter).
  3. Hardware Synergy? – Could Meta AI Pro bundle with Quest VR or Ray-Ban Meta glasses?

Expert Analysis: Can Meta Compete with OpenAI & Google?

As a digital strategist tracking AI trends since 2020, I see three possible outcomes:

✅ Success Scenario – If Meta AI’s paid tier offers unique social integrations (e.g., WhatsApp business tools), it could carve a niche.
⚠ Mid-Tier Performer – If it’s just a ChatGPT clone, users may stick with established players.
❌ Struggle Scenario – If Meta rushes ads too aggressively, it could alienate users (like X/Twitter’s AI backlash).


What Should Users Do Now?

🔹 Try Meta AI’s Free Tier – Test its image generation & chatbot before paying.
🔹 Watch for Early Beta Access – Meta may offer discounts for early subscribers.
🔹 Compare Alternatives – Gemini Advanced and Copilot Pro still lead in enterprise AI.


Final Verdict: A Bold Gamble, But Will It Pay Off?

Meta’s move into paid AI was inevitable—but its $72B investment shows Zuckerberg is all-in. The key will be differentiation:

✔ If Meta AI leverages its social data (e.g., personalized recommendations), it could win.
✖ If it’s just another chatbot, users may ignore it.

Your Turn: Would you pay for Meta AI Pro, or stick with ChatGPT/Gemini? Comment below!

Meta has confirmed another round of layoffs, this time targeting its Reality Labs division, though the exact number of affected employees remains undisclosed. This move comes as part of the company’s ongoing “Year of Efficiency” initiative that began in 2023, which has already seen Meta reduce its workforce by about 22% across multiple waves of cuts.

Areas Most Affected by the Cuts

The restructuring has particularly impacted:

  • Oculus Studios teams developing games for Quest VR headsets
  • Hardware development groups working on future VR/AR devices
  • Supernatural, Meta’s flagship VR fitness platform acquired for $400 million in 2021

A message posted to the official Supernatural Facebook group suggests these changes aim to “help us work more efficiently on what the future of fitness could be,” indicating possible strategic redirection rather than complete abandonment of the fitness vertical.

Behind Meta’s Reality Labs Restructuring

Mixed Signals in Meta’s VR Strategy

Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton explained the changes reflect structural shifts meant to improve efficiency in developing “future mixed reality experiences.” This carefully worded statement suggests:

  1. A continued commitment to VR/AR development
  2. Potential reallocation of resources toward more promising projects
  3. Possible deprioritization of certain existing VR content

The Broader Context of Meta’s VR Challenges

These layoffs occur against a backdrop of:

  • Disappointing Quest headset sales, with the Quest 3S already seeing price cuts
  • Strong performance of Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, exceeding expectations
  • Ongoing financial losses in Reality Labs, which reported $3.8 billion in operating losses in Q1 2024 alone

Analyzing the Implications

What This Means for the VR Industry

  1. Content Development Slowdown: Fewer resources for Oculus Studios may mean fewer first-party VR titles
  2. Strategic Reprioritization: Meta appears to be shifting focus from pure VR toward mixed reality
  3. Hardware Uncertainty: Layoffs in hardware teams raise questions about future device roadmaps

The Supernatural Paradox

The treatment of Supernatural is particularly noteworthy:

  • Legal Victory: Meta successfully defended its acquisition against antitrust challenges
  • High Investment: The $400 million purchase was one of Meta’s largest VR content acquisitions
  • Current Downsizing: Despite this, the team is now facing cuts

Expert Perspectives on Meta’s Moves

Industry analysts suggest several interpretations:

  • Cost-Cutting Measure: Part of Zuckerberg’s efficiency drive amid massive Reality Labs losses
  • Strategic Pivot: Possibly reallocating resources toward AI integration in VR/AR
  • Market Realignment: Responding to slower-than-expected VR adoption rates

The Road Ahead for Meta’s Metaverse Vision

While these cuts might suggest wavering commitment, Meta maintains it’s still investing heavily in mixed reality. Key questions remain:

  • Will these efficiency moves accelerate profitability in Reality Labs?
  • How will content quality be affected by reduced development teams?
  • Does this signal a broader shift in Meta’s metaverse strategy?

One thing is clear: Meta continues to balance its ambitious long-term VR/AR goals with the financial realities of running a public company. These layoffs represent another adjustment in that delicate balancing act rather than a wholesale retreat from the metaverse vision.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles