Techfullnews

MySpace: The Social Media Site for Our Time

MySpace

We do not need more social media. But we need MySpace back.

Why? Because we need less social media.

We are all exhausted with the current social media landscape. The apps are all clones of each other, and they all kind of suck. Instagram has sucked for years. Facebook isn’t even worth mentioning. TikTok is too good, which is a problem because it’s nearly impossible to put down.

Every social media platform is trying to be everything, and in the process, they are losing their novelty and becoming less useful, more harmful, and comparatively mediocre.

MySpace was the perfect passive social media site. It was like AIM but grown up a little. It died before it lived long enough to become the villain.

MySpace was basically like creating a personal homepage. You could customize the colors and designs, have your favorite track playing on your page, post status updates, talk with pals by leaving comments, and, most notably, rank your Top 8 friends.

You could also personalize your profile page using rudimentary knowledge of HTML and CSS. The platform taught a generation how to code.

That was part of the charm of MySpace. It allowed users to express themselves and their interests by creating a singular space that was unique to them. It was made for people and not brand advertisers.

Now, I think the winds of change are blowing back in MySpace’s direction. BeReal took off because it promised to be a social media site designed to make you do less curating. What if we had a curated social media site designed to do less?

Instagram recently launched the ability to add songs to notes and posts. That’s a cheap copy of a key MySpace feature: the ability to add a song to your profile page to match your mood.

Insider recently published research that suggests social media as we knew it is dying. Regular people are posting less while still checking their feeds. Influencers post a ton, but they’re basically just brands. Normal folks want to log in, check things, and log off. We’re already doing that with sites not designed for that. That was pretty much MySpace’s entire purpose.

So, why not MySpace? Why can’t we bring it back? Who says you can’t go home?

It is the perfect social media site for 2023. It is a snapshot of your life. You update it as you please, but it doesn’t require constant attention and maintenance. If you log off for a two-week vacation, things would basically be as you left it. There wouldn’t 15 different trends you missed. You wouldn’t have to worry about gaining or losing followers because — gasp — followers weren’t really a thing.

You had the social hierarchy associated with your Top 8, and that was all you needed. The platform was far more focused on making a cool page and talking to your actual friends.

The real reason MySpace hasn’t been revived is because the tech giants can’t monetize it. But honestly, when has that ever stopped anything in tech?

This isn’t just a rosy bit of nostalgia from me. I am the person, after all, who once dug up the remnants of his old MySpace out of dumb curiosity.

https://x.com/somefinetweets/status/1696936059773571346?s=20

Beyond the nostalgia, I do truly think there’s a real opportunity to shift how we interact with social media moving forward. MySpace does still exist in some form, so maybe it’s a tall ask to have it rebrand into some 2023 version of its old self. Yet, the revived MySpace doesn’t have to be MySpace. If everyone suddenly joined NoSpace, effectively a MySpace dupe for Gen Z, that would be just as radical.

These days, people crave a more intimate online experience, and MySpace was just that.

Whatever happens, I’m certain about one thing. We have to keep the Top 8. Sure, it seems petty to rank your friends. But that was exactly what made MySpace so personal: The stakes were so low the only drama was figuring out who were the eight friends you considered closest.

Here are some additional thoughts on why MySpace could be the social media site for our time:

  • MySpace was a place where people could be themselves. There was less pressure to curate your image or to be perfect.
  • MySpace was a place to connect with friends and family. It was less about following celebrities or influencers.
  • MySpace was a place to express yourself creatively. You could customize your profile page and add your own music and videos.

I believe that there is a growing desire for a social media platform that is more personal, less curated, and more creative. MySpace could be the platform to fill that need.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In a strategic shift, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed plans for a premium subscription tier for Meta AI, positioning it to compete directly with OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus, Google’s Gemini Advanced, and Microsoft’s Copilot Pro. The announcement came during Meta’s Q1 2025 earnings call, signaling a major push to monetize its rapidly growing AI platform.

With nearly 1 billion users already engaging with Meta AI across Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, and its new standalone app, this move could reshape the AI subscription wars. But will users pay for yet another premium chatbot?


Why Is Meta Introducing a Paid AI Tier?

Zuckerberg framed the decision as a natural evolution:

“There’s an opportunity to offer a premium service for people who want to unlock more compute or additional functionality.”

This suggests Meta AI’s paid version could include:
✔ Faster, more powerful AI responses (similar to GPT-4 Turbo in ChatGPT Plus)
✔ Advanced image generation (beyond current free capabilities)
✔ Early access to new AI features (like multi-modal AI or coding assistance)
✔ Ad-free or priority support

Meta’s AI Expansion: A $72 Billion Bet

Meta’s AI ambitions are skyrocketing, with key developments:

  • New Standalone Meta AI App – Launched this week, allowing direct chatbot interaction and image generation.
  • Massive Investment Increase – AI spending projections jumped from 65Bto65Bto72B, outpacing rivals.
  • Ads & Product Recommendations Coming – Zuckerberg hinted at AI-powered shopping integrations, similar to Google’s SGE.

But here’s the catch: Meta won’t rush monetization. Zuckerberg emphasized:

“We’ll be focused on scaling and deepening engagement for at least the next year before building out the business.”

This means the paid tier may not launch until 2026, giving Meta time to refine its AI before charging users.


How Does Meta AI Compare to Paid Rivals?

FeatureMeta AI (Free)Meta AI (Paid?)ChatGPT PlusGemini Advanced
Speed/PerformanceStandardLikely fasterGPT-4 TurboGemini Ultra
Image GenerationYes (basic)Advanced?DALL·E 3Imagen 2
Multi-Modal AILimitedPossible upgradeYes (voice/vision)Yes (Gemini 1.5)
PriceFreeTBA (Est. 10−10−20/mo)$20/month$19.99/month

Key Question: Will Meta undercut competitors on pricing, or match them with superior features?


The Bigger Picture: Meta’s AI Monetization Strategy

  1. Freemium Model Works – Like OpenAI, Meta will likely keep a free tier to retain mass adoption.
  2. Ads Are Coming – AI-generated product recommendations could boost Meta’s ad revenue (already at $42B last quarter).
  3. Hardware Synergy? – Could Meta AI Pro bundle with Quest VR or Ray-Ban Meta glasses?

Expert Analysis: Can Meta Compete with OpenAI & Google?

As a digital strategist tracking AI trends since 2020, I see three possible outcomes:

✅ Success Scenario – If Meta AI’s paid tier offers unique social integrations (e.g., WhatsApp business tools), it could carve a niche.
⚠ Mid-Tier Performer – If it’s just a ChatGPT clone, users may stick with established players.
❌ Struggle Scenario – If Meta rushes ads too aggressively, it could alienate users (like X/Twitter’s AI backlash).


What Should Users Do Now?

🔹 Try Meta AI’s Free Tier – Test its image generation & chatbot before paying.
🔹 Watch for Early Beta Access – Meta may offer discounts for early subscribers.
🔹 Compare Alternatives – Gemini Advanced and Copilot Pro still lead in enterprise AI.


Final Verdict: A Bold Gamble, But Will It Pay Off?

Meta’s move into paid AI was inevitable—but its $72B investment shows Zuckerberg is all-in. The key will be differentiation:

✔ If Meta AI leverages its social data (e.g., personalized recommendations), it could win.
✖ If it’s just another chatbot, users may ignore it.

Your Turn: Would you pay for Meta AI Pro, or stick with ChatGPT/Gemini? Comment below!

Meta has confirmed another round of layoffs, this time targeting its Reality Labs division, though the exact number of affected employees remains undisclosed. This move comes as part of the company’s ongoing “Year of Efficiency” initiative that began in 2023, which has already seen Meta reduce its workforce by about 22% across multiple waves of cuts.

Areas Most Affected by the Cuts

The restructuring has particularly impacted:

  • Oculus Studios teams developing games for Quest VR headsets
  • Hardware development groups working on future VR/AR devices
  • Supernatural, Meta’s flagship VR fitness platform acquired for $400 million in 2021

A message posted to the official Supernatural Facebook group suggests these changes aim to “help us work more efficiently on what the future of fitness could be,” indicating possible strategic redirection rather than complete abandonment of the fitness vertical.

Behind Meta’s Reality Labs Restructuring

Mixed Signals in Meta’s VR Strategy

Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton explained the changes reflect structural shifts meant to improve efficiency in developing “future mixed reality experiences.” This carefully worded statement suggests:

  1. A continued commitment to VR/AR development
  2. Potential reallocation of resources toward more promising projects
  3. Possible deprioritization of certain existing VR content

The Broader Context of Meta’s VR Challenges

These layoffs occur against a backdrop of:

  • Disappointing Quest headset sales, with the Quest 3S already seeing price cuts
  • Strong performance of Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, exceeding expectations
  • Ongoing financial losses in Reality Labs, which reported $3.8 billion in operating losses in Q1 2024 alone

Analyzing the Implications

What This Means for the VR Industry

  1. Content Development Slowdown: Fewer resources for Oculus Studios may mean fewer first-party VR titles
  2. Strategic Reprioritization: Meta appears to be shifting focus from pure VR toward mixed reality
  3. Hardware Uncertainty: Layoffs in hardware teams raise questions about future device roadmaps

The Supernatural Paradox

The treatment of Supernatural is particularly noteworthy:

  • Legal Victory: Meta successfully defended its acquisition against antitrust challenges
  • High Investment: The $400 million purchase was one of Meta’s largest VR content acquisitions
  • Current Downsizing: Despite this, the team is now facing cuts

Expert Perspectives on Meta’s Moves

Industry analysts suggest several interpretations:

  • Cost-Cutting Measure: Part of Zuckerberg’s efficiency drive amid massive Reality Labs losses
  • Strategic Pivot: Possibly reallocating resources toward AI integration in VR/AR
  • Market Realignment: Responding to slower-than-expected VR adoption rates

The Road Ahead for Meta’s Metaverse Vision

While these cuts might suggest wavering commitment, Meta maintains it’s still investing heavily in mixed reality. Key questions remain:

  • Will these efficiency moves accelerate profitability in Reality Labs?
  • How will content quality be affected by reduced development teams?
  • Does this signal a broader shift in Meta’s metaverse strategy?

One thing is clear: Meta continues to balance its ambitious long-term VR/AR goals with the financial realities of running a public company. These layoffs represent another adjustment in that delicate balancing act rather than a wholesale retreat from the metaverse vision.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles