Techfullnews

Owner of @x Twitter handle says no one reached out ahead of Twitter’s rebranding to ‘X’

x twitter

Twitter’s ambitious rebranding as “X” has hit a series of stumbling blocks, leading to a chaotic rollout that left many aspects of the site in disarray. While parts of the platform were referencing the new “X” brand, other sections still displayed prompts to “search Twitter” or use the familiar blue button to “Tweet.” As if that wasn’t enough, Reuters reported that Twitter failed to secure the intellectual property rights for the “X” brand.

The rebranding process faced further challenges when Twitter attempted to remove the iconic Twitter sign from its San Francisco headquarters without obtaining the necessary permit, resulting in police intervention to halt the work. To add to the confusion, Twitter also neglected to secure the @x Twitter handle, which is owned by Gene X Hwang, co-founder of the corporate photography and videography studio Orange Photography. While the @x account is currently set to private, it is referenced by the San Francisco-based @orangephoto account, attributing the founders as “Gene X Hwang & Jack Huynh,” with the latter being Jack Huynh.

Surprisingly, Twitter has yet to make any contact with Gene X Hwang regarding the @x account he operates. Hwang stated that he would be open to discussing the handle’s transfer if Twitter were to make a reasonable offer. However, he has not set a specific price in mind, although it is worth noting that coveted Instagram handles often sell for thousands of dollars.

The rushed nature of Twitter’s rebranding to “X” was evident as their website and app still contained references to the old name, even after Elon Musk’s announcement. Despite rebranding the main @Twitter handle as “X,” the underlying handle remained @twitter, leading to user confusion and criticism.

Apart from the handling of the rebrand itself, potential legal issues have arisen due to trademark conflicts. Microsoft holds an X trademark linked to Xbox since 2003, and Meta possesses a federal trademark for a blue-and-white letter “X” since 2019. Although Meta’s trademark logo differs from Twitter’s new “X” branding, the inclusion of online social networking services within their coverage raises concerns.

Trademark attorney Josh Gerben believes there is a high likelihood that Twitter will face legal challenges over the “X” rebranding. Gerben has counted nearly 900 active U.S. trademark registrations covering “X” in various industries, making the situation potentially complicated.

Aside from legal battles, Musk’s abrupt renaming of Twitter to “X” might have an adverse impact on the brand’s value. Analysts and agencies suggest that Musk’s move could have resulted in a significant decline of $4 billion to $20 billion in Twitter’s value, eroding the value that the brand has carefully built over 15-plus years.

As the dust settles on this eventful rebranding, Twitter will need to navigate potential legal issues while restoring confidence and value to its newly christened “X” identity. The path ahead remains uncertain, but Twitter’s ability to adapt and address these challenges will be crucial in shaping the success of the “X” brand in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT
RECOMMENDED
NEXT UP

In a strategic shift, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed plans for a premium subscription tier for Meta AI, positioning it to compete directly with OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus, Google’s Gemini Advanced, and Microsoft’s Copilot Pro. The announcement came during Meta’s Q1 2025 earnings call, signaling a major push to monetize its rapidly growing AI platform.

With nearly 1 billion users already engaging with Meta AI across Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, and its new standalone app, this move could reshape the AI subscription wars. But will users pay for yet another premium chatbot?


Why Is Meta Introducing a Paid AI Tier?

Zuckerberg framed the decision as a natural evolution:

“There’s an opportunity to offer a premium service for people who want to unlock more compute or additional functionality.”

This suggests Meta AI’s paid version could include:
✔ Faster, more powerful AI responses (similar to GPT-4 Turbo in ChatGPT Plus)
✔ Advanced image generation (beyond current free capabilities)
✔ Early access to new AI features (like multi-modal AI or coding assistance)
✔ Ad-free or priority support

Meta’s AI Expansion: A $72 Billion Bet

Meta’s AI ambitions are skyrocketing, with key developments:

  • New Standalone Meta AI App – Launched this week, allowing direct chatbot interaction and image generation.
  • Massive Investment Increase – AI spending projections jumped from 65Bto65Bto72B, outpacing rivals.
  • Ads & Product Recommendations Coming – Zuckerberg hinted at AI-powered shopping integrations, similar to Google’s SGE.

But here’s the catch: Meta won’t rush monetization. Zuckerberg emphasized:

“We’ll be focused on scaling and deepening engagement for at least the next year before building out the business.”

This means the paid tier may not launch until 2026, giving Meta time to refine its AI before charging users.


How Does Meta AI Compare to Paid Rivals?

FeatureMeta AI (Free)Meta AI (Paid?)ChatGPT PlusGemini Advanced
Speed/PerformanceStandardLikely fasterGPT-4 TurboGemini Ultra
Image GenerationYes (basic)Advanced?DALL·E 3Imagen 2
Multi-Modal AILimitedPossible upgradeYes (voice/vision)Yes (Gemini 1.5)
PriceFreeTBA (Est. 10−10−20/mo)$20/month$19.99/month

Key Question: Will Meta undercut competitors on pricing, or match them with superior features?


The Bigger Picture: Meta’s AI Monetization Strategy

  1. Freemium Model Works – Like OpenAI, Meta will likely keep a free tier to retain mass adoption.
  2. Ads Are Coming – AI-generated product recommendations could boost Meta’s ad revenue (already at $42B last quarter).
  3. Hardware Synergy? – Could Meta AI Pro bundle with Quest VR or Ray-Ban Meta glasses?

Expert Analysis: Can Meta Compete with OpenAI & Google?

As a digital strategist tracking AI trends since 2020, I see three possible outcomes:

✅ Success Scenario – If Meta AI’s paid tier offers unique social integrations (e.g., WhatsApp business tools), it could carve a niche.
⚠ Mid-Tier Performer – If it’s just a ChatGPT clone, users may stick with established players.
❌ Struggle Scenario – If Meta rushes ads too aggressively, it could alienate users (like X/Twitter’s AI backlash).


What Should Users Do Now?

🔹 Try Meta AI’s Free Tier – Test its image generation & chatbot before paying.
🔹 Watch for Early Beta Access – Meta may offer discounts for early subscribers.
🔹 Compare Alternatives – Gemini Advanced and Copilot Pro still lead in enterprise AI.


Final Verdict: A Bold Gamble, But Will It Pay Off?

Meta’s move into paid AI was inevitable—but its $72B investment shows Zuckerberg is all-in. The key will be differentiation:

✔ If Meta AI leverages its social data (e.g., personalized recommendations), it could win.
✖ If it’s just another chatbot, users may ignore it.

Your Turn: Would you pay for Meta AI Pro, or stick with ChatGPT/Gemini? Comment below!

Meta has confirmed another round of layoffs, this time targeting its Reality Labs division, though the exact number of affected employees remains undisclosed. This move comes as part of the company’s ongoing “Year of Efficiency” initiative that began in 2023, which has already seen Meta reduce its workforce by about 22% across multiple waves of cuts.

Areas Most Affected by the Cuts

The restructuring has particularly impacted:

  • Oculus Studios teams developing games for Quest VR headsets
  • Hardware development groups working on future VR/AR devices
  • Supernatural, Meta’s flagship VR fitness platform acquired for $400 million in 2021

A message posted to the official Supernatural Facebook group suggests these changes aim to “help us work more efficiently on what the future of fitness could be,” indicating possible strategic redirection rather than complete abandonment of the fitness vertical.

Behind Meta’s Reality Labs Restructuring

Mixed Signals in Meta’s VR Strategy

Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton explained the changes reflect structural shifts meant to improve efficiency in developing “future mixed reality experiences.” This carefully worded statement suggests:

  1. A continued commitment to VR/AR development
  2. Potential reallocation of resources toward more promising projects
  3. Possible deprioritization of certain existing VR content

The Broader Context of Meta’s VR Challenges

These layoffs occur against a backdrop of:

  • Disappointing Quest headset sales, with the Quest 3S already seeing price cuts
  • Strong performance of Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, exceeding expectations
  • Ongoing financial losses in Reality Labs, which reported $3.8 billion in operating losses in Q1 2024 alone

Analyzing the Implications

What This Means for the VR Industry

  1. Content Development Slowdown: Fewer resources for Oculus Studios may mean fewer first-party VR titles
  2. Strategic Reprioritization: Meta appears to be shifting focus from pure VR toward mixed reality
  3. Hardware Uncertainty: Layoffs in hardware teams raise questions about future device roadmaps

The Supernatural Paradox

The treatment of Supernatural is particularly noteworthy:

  • Legal Victory: Meta successfully defended its acquisition against antitrust challenges
  • High Investment: The $400 million purchase was one of Meta’s largest VR content acquisitions
  • Current Downsizing: Despite this, the team is now facing cuts

Expert Perspectives on Meta’s Moves

Industry analysts suggest several interpretations:

  • Cost-Cutting Measure: Part of Zuckerberg’s efficiency drive amid massive Reality Labs losses
  • Strategic Pivot: Possibly reallocating resources toward AI integration in VR/AR
  • Market Realignment: Responding to slower-than-expected VR adoption rates

The Road Ahead for Meta’s Metaverse Vision

While these cuts might suggest wavering commitment, Meta maintains it’s still investing heavily in mixed reality. Key questions remain:

  • Will these efficiency moves accelerate profitability in Reality Labs?
  • How will content quality be affected by reduced development teams?
  • Does this signal a broader shift in Meta’s metaverse strategy?

One thing is clear: Meta continues to balance its ambitious long-term VR/AR goals with the financial realities of running a public company. These layoffs represent another adjustment in that delicate balancing act rather than a wholesale retreat from the metaverse vision.

ADVERTISEMENT
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Get notified about new articles